Print-thinking

Gerry McGov­ern is no stranger to the cheeze puff. He mainly deals in cor­por­ate web-sites and ‘killer apps’ but beneath the web­site hype he’s mak­ing all the right noises:

What is print-thinking? Print lends itself to length and to eco­nom­ies of scale. It’s not that much more expens­ive to print a 120-page report than a 100-page one. It’s often not much cheaper to print one copy than to print 1,000. These eco­nom­ies of print influ­ence how we write in subtle and vari­ous ways.

Is the concept of the annual report a print-specific idea? Why do we need an annual report when we can get an instant update by vis­it­ing the web­site of the organ­iz­a­tion? Often, the con­tent of an annual report is assembled months before it is pub­lished. It can be out-of-date and irrel­ev­ant long before the ink dries.

When an organ­iz­a­tion prints customer-related con­tent, that con­tent is nearly always to be con­sumed out­side the organ­iz­a­tion. Thus, it is writ­ten in a very par­tic­u­lar way, with lots of con­text, and with many sen­tences begin­ning with the name of the organ­iz­a­tion. It is designed to go out.

The con­tent on an organization’s web­site is designed to stay in. The web­site itself is the con­text, and the very fact that the cus­tomer has vis­ited the web­site implies that they have a cer­tain aware­ness of the organ­iz­a­tion. This cru­cial dif­fer­ence can change the whole dynamic of how you write web content.

Print con­tent is often leis­urely and flowery. Web con­tent is lean and pared to the bone. Often, the best web con­tent is not a sen­tence at all, but rather a descript­ive link.

Link­ing is the essence of web con­tent, and a good web writer thinks in webs of links, rather than in series of pages. This is per­haps the greatest chal­lenge for someone trained in print—to break that lin­ear mode of think­ing and think linking.

[HT: Alastair Rolfe]

Tactics or strategy in running orders?

I’ve lav­ished praise on CBS NewsPub­lic Eye site before. A recent post raises the influ­ence of demo­graph­ics on the con­tent of the Even­ing News, and the dilem­mas that poses — always, but always, in second-guessing story selection.

My per­sonal view is that it’s a mis­take to break news­casts down story by story. You’re much bet­ter off deliv­er­ing a coher­ent broad­cast because, unlike news execs, view­ers tend to not to judge pro­grammes in isol­ated chunks. In other words, story selec­tion should run stra­tegic­ally, not tactically.

Call to mind the oft-quoted Sun Tzu line: “Tac­tics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” Small tac­tical wins that don’t relate to a stra­tegic — and shared — vis­ion of where a broad­cast is going won’t beat a well-articulated long-term strategy with cor­res­pond­ent and pro­du­cer buy-in. Get­ting buy-in is tough. Just because people keep tak­ing the net­work cheque do you think there’s buy-in to the new Even­ing News across CBS? Not enough. And without the buy-in the vis­ion for the new Couric broad­cast — how­ever neces­sary — can only be imposed, and the sound you’re hear­ing is of teeth grind­ing away in the background.

Any­way, enough of my pitch for the appar­ently recently-vacated EP job at NBC News!

Newspapers before focus groups…

In the 1840s Amer­ican poet Walt Whit­man was a news­pa­per editor in Brook­lyn, run­ning the Daily Eagle. Before Paul Laz­arsfeld came up with the focus group, here’s how one of Whitman’s edit­or­i­als described the rela­tion­ship between journ­al­ist and reader:

We really feel a desire to talk on many sub­jects to all the people of Brook­lyn; and it ain’t their nine­pences we want so much either. There is a curi­ous kind of sym­pathy (haven’t you ever thought of it before?) that arises in the mind of a news­pa­per con­ductor with the pub­lic he serves … Daily com­mu­nion cre­ates a sort of broth­er­hood and sis­ter­hood between the two parties.”

I like the idea of news­pa­per conductors…

Ian Reeves

A blo­go­spheric wel­come to former Press Gaz­ette ed, and good egg Ian Reeves — I’ve added him to the RSS and the links (btw it’s M-o-n–C–k — people died to win that extra ‘C’).

Ian’s prom­ising to vlog (pron. vee-log/vuh-log/ver-log?), and is after cri­ti­cism. Well, we do cri­ti­cism out here. But con­struct­ive cri­ti­cism? That’s consultancy!