The future of Channel 4

David Lloyd calls for a new pub­lic endow­ment for Chan­nel 4 in the Guard­ian today.

It’s an edit of a very enter­tain­ing lec­ture he gave at City Uni­ver­sity last Tues­day — and which we’ll post soon on our website.

He mis­chiev­ously fuelled spec­u­la­tion that Mark Thompson wasn’t the first choice for Chan­nel 4 CEO when the job fell vacant, post Michael Jack­son.

And in case you think stu­dents provide an awe­struck and ador­ing audi­ence, you couldn’t be more wrong. David’s plea for the chan­nel was chal­lenged most power­fully by stu­dents in their twen­ties who recall noth­ing of its out­put before the late 1990s. They’re a tough crowd…

The Dead Journalists Society (sponsored by Uzbekistan)

Has a new mem­ber, Alisher Sai­pov. Sai­pov was shot dead out­side his office. Of course, there is no evid­ence con­nect­ing the murder of this critic of the Uzbek régime and afore­said repress­ive régime.

Why only the other week, the European Union was offer­ing Uzbek­istan a little car­rot, to encour­age it to repress a little more lightly [my ital­ics below]:

With a view to encour­aging the Uzbek author­it­ies to take pos­it­ive steps to improve the human rights situ­ation and tak­ing into account their com­mit­ments, the Coun­cil decided that the visa restric­tions would not apply for a period of six months, at which point the Coun­cil will review if the Uzbek author­it­ies have made pro­gress towards meet­ing the con­di­tions men­tioned in para­graph 4 of these Con­clu­sions. The Coun­cil may decide to apply the visa restric­tions earlier if neces­sary, in light of the actions of the Uzbek author­it­ies in the area of human rights.

We wouldn’t want to reim­pose sanc­tions because some guy with a three month old daugh­ter couldn’t keep his mouth shut — now would we?

And we don’t want to annoy our Ger­man friends who can see a side to the Uzbek régime that cyn­ical types like Craig Mur­ray seem quite unable to.

And just who would we like to see shot dead next, to keep the house warm and the heat­ing bills down this winter?

Why be a journalist?

Why be a journ­al­ist? The recent For­bes report that lis­ted journ­al­ism as an endangered pro­fes­sion has got an answer from the ever read­able John Robin­son:

What a crock … the report ignores the two reas­ons that every­one I’ve ever met in print journ­al­ism got into the busi­ness: they love the work and they want to change the world. I’ve been in news­pa­pers for 30 years, and the pay has always been lousy to mediocre, the hours long and the pres­sures intense. No one gets into it to get rich.

It’s tough on the home life. You’re on call 24/7. Does it have to be that way? No, and when I win the Powerball and start a news com­pany, I will change it, but mean­while, it is what it is. Still.… You get into it to do some­thing dif­fer­ent and excit­ing every day, to meet fas­cin­at­ing people and to write about intriguing things, and to make a dif­fer­ence by telling people things that are import­ant. It’s a damned excit­ing way to make a living.