The UK Defence Ministry and public information

May 19, 2008

How good is the UK Defence Min­istry (the MOD) at releas­ing inform­a­tion to the pub­lic? Let’s look at its news releases for 13 May, 2008.

  1. Army launches ‘The Pipers’ Trail’ 13 May 08 — His­tory and Hon­our — Brit­ish Army
  2. Army Officer sur­vives Taliban gren­ade attack 13 May 08 — People In Defence — Min­istry Of Defence|British Army
  3. Red Arrows give an ‘Illus­tri­ous’ dis­play 13 May 08 — Train­ing and Adven­ture — Royal Navy|Royal Air Force

And you can sub­scribe to its news releases via RSS, in case you want to know more about lucky escapes, bag­pipes and air displays.

Also released that day was a Board of Inquiry into a Her­cules crash in Iraq in 2007. It is a heav­ily redac­ted inquiry into the loss of an air­craft that will cost over £30m to replace. Unless you know what a Board of Inquiry is, you might miss it. The site is effect­ively bur­ied online.

Fur­ther entombed in the inform­a­tion mauso­leum of a — tech­nical term — crappy PDF of the hear­ing is this gem:

The UK ACC’s sound and well-reasoned approach to the release of inform­a­tion sur­round­ing the incid­ent and the sub­sequent ac [air­craft] destruc­tion, res­ul­ted in min­imal media interest. This denied the enemy the oppor­tun­ity to exploit the situ­ation for the bene­fit of their IO campaign.

And denied the Brit­ish pub­lic and its rep­res­ent­at­ives an oppor­tun­ity to ques­tion the effect­ive­ness of the pro­tec­tion of its forces.

Want another gem? The plane was landed by the co-pilot who wasn’t cleared to fly.

This was not, in the Board’s view, a delib­er­ate dis­reg­ard of the rules but rather an unchal­lenged cul­tural accept­ance of a prac­tice that had been con­duc­ted by other crews across the C130J fleet.

So basic­ally the MoD’s Her­cules pilots play to their own rules oper­a­tion­ally. What if those same “unchal­lenged cul­tural accept­ances” exten­ded to rules of engage­ment in Iraq? Why wouldn’t they? That might be one for another inquiry.

Sounds a little harsh per­haps, but inquir­ies raise ques­tions and ques­tions need answers.

BTW this was how the Even­ing Stand­ard repor­ted the incident:

BRITISH forces blew up a dam­aged RAF Her­cules in Iraq today to stop it fall­ing into enemy hands. The plane was ser­i­ously dam­aged dur­ing land­ing north of Al Amarah in south­ern Iraq. Mil­it­ary chiefs decided repairs would have taken too long.

Let’s remem­ber the rationale for not admit­ting this was the res­ult of IEDs. A pro­pa­ganda vic­tory for enemy “inform­a­tion oper­a­tions.” Now the Iraqi insur­gency doesn’t own the BBC or CNN or Al Jaz­eera or Al Hurra etc. etc.

The abso­lutely right­ful media interest in the loss of an air­craft was effect­ively blacked out. No ques­tions in par­lia­ment either.

The exec­ut­ive has to do bet­ter than this.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: