A private letter to Google

I chose my home for its seclu­sion and pri­vacy. You can’t see in from the pub­lic right of way that bor­ders the garden. You can’t see the slide and swing and trampoline.

No offence, but we don’t really want you to. Of course, this all shows up on the satel­lite photo on Google Maps.

Now any­one can fly over my home — if they have an air­craft lying around. And satel­lite pho­tos have been around for years. But detailed pic­tures of my garden with my children’s play area and the routes of access haven’t been freely avail­able with the abso­lute ease that Google now provides.

And given the incre­mental way in which this devel­op­ment has occurred, when we move seam­lessly to real time satel­lite images, my irra­tional fears of pred­at­ory Google map­ping child abduct­ors won’t seem quite so barmy.

3 thoughts on “A private letter to Google

  1. I mean no dis­respect, but even with real-time satel­lite images, your fears of child abduct­ors will still be barmy. For one, child abduc­tions are sur­pris­ingly rare, and for another, are usu­ally pre­cip­it­ated, not by ran­dom google map­pings of your prop­erty, but com­mu­nic­a­tion with your child online.

    Now I’m not a father, so maybe this is harder than it sounds, but it seems your best defense has never been hid­ing your kid away in the woods, but rather to talk with them and ask them what they’re doing online and in their life. Again, prob­ably a lot harder than I know, but still.

    None of this is to say you shouldn’t be para­noid about real-time satel­lite images of your house, just that child abduc­tions will prob­ably not see a pre­cip­it­ous rise as a result.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>