<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google cache and libel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adrianmonck.com/2008/06/google-cache-and-libel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/06/google-cache-and-libel/</link>
	<description>a blog about news and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Roberts</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/06/google-cache-and-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1009#comment-2940</guid>
		<description>I do not know for sure, but it is my assumption that United Kingdom is a party to the European Union e-commerce directive 2000. If so Google is pretty much covered under article 12.

He is an easy-to-read version on my website:

http://www.rexxfield.com/EU_Directive_on_electronic_commerce.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not know for sure, but it is my assumption that United Kingdom is a party to the European Union e-commerce directive 2000. If so Google is pretty much covered under article 12.</p>
<p>He is an easy-to-read version on my website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rexxfield.com/EU_Directive_on_electronic_commerce.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.rexxfield.com/EU_Directive_on_electronic_commerce.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/06/google-cache-and-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1009#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Yeah, ha ha -- on that issue we lawyers like to say &#039;good cases make bad law&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, ha ha — on that issue we lawyers like to say ‘good cases make bad law’…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/06/google-cache-and-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1009#comment-788</guid>
		<description>Thanks Russ, Re: authors and responsibility cf the &lt;a href=&quot;www.nytimes.com/2008/06/10/nyregion/10internet.html?hp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;NY Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; story today on the rather more hot-button issue of child pornography: &lt;blockquote&gt;“The I.S.P.s’ point had been, ‘We’re not responsible, these are individuals communicating with individuals, we’re not responsible,’ ” he said, referring to Internet service providers. “Our point was that at some point, you do bear responsibility.”&lt;blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Russ, Re: authors and responsibility cf the <a href="www.nytimes.com/2008/06/10/nyregion/10internet.html?hp" rel="nofollow"><em>NY Times</em></a> story today on the rather more hot-button issue of child pornography:<br />
<blockquote>“The I.S.P.s’ point had been, ‘We’re not responsible, these are individuals communicating with individuals, we’re not responsible,’ ” he said, referring to Internet service providers. “Our point was that at some point, you do bear responsibility.”<br />
<blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

