Sexism on BBC News

June 1, 2008

The num­ber of women report­ers on the BBC’s flag­ship 10pm news broad­cast is down. How so? Per­ni­cious bloke-ism by the programme’s editor, Craig Oliver?BBC News

Well, if you only pur­sued a strategy of put­ting on air the BBC’s edit­ors — its best journ­al­ists — you would pack your run­ning order with:

  • Nick Robin­son, Polit­ics
  • Robert Peston, Busi­ness
  • Mark Easton, Home Affairs
  • Justin Webb, North America
  • Jeremy Bowen, Middle East
  • Mark Mar­dell, Europe
  • John Simpson, World Affairs
  • Mihir Bose, Sport

Room for a dif­fer­ent chro­mo­some? Ah yes…

  • Stephanie Flanders, Eco­nom­ics

Who is to blame for this sexual dis­bal­ance? After all, Oliver didn’t make those appoint­ments. It must be the man­age­ment: Helen Boaden, Dir­ector of News? Maybe for report­ing it’s Fran Unsworth, Head of Newsgathering?

Just kid­ding. The BBC has an impress­ive tranche of female exec­ut­ives. But news organ­iz­a­tions don’t make life easy for women journ­al­ists who want to have kids and stay work­ing. Look at the num­ber of female report­ers who took redundo (buy-outs) at the BBC recently.

So is this really about sex­ism? I don’t think so.

Read between the lines. Oliver wants the top team on the 10. That’s more male than female (blame leg­acy appoint­ments). With the new, leaner Beeb news­gath­er­ing régime that puts pres­sure on assign­ers. The res­ult is conflict.

In polit­ical organ­iz­a­tions, war­fare mani­fests itself not in bloody frontal assaults but in tac­tical flank­ing man­oeuvres like the one against Oliver and his pro­gramme. And what was it Henry Kis­singer used to say of universities…

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Dave Lee June 1, 2008 at 09:42

Without sounding too much like one of those daft BBC Have Your Say commenters, I wonder what the reaction would be if the imbalance was in favour of women?

Sexism? Or a triumph for the females?

Reply

2 nigel barlow June 1, 2008 at 11:39

Yep,I’m sure that news organisations make life difficult for women reporters Adrian but are they any different to any other organisation in that respect.

You make a good point.You put your best people forward,it is not the BBC news’ fault that at the present time they all happen to be men

Reply

3 Nick Reynolds June 1, 2008 at 12:56

Peter Horrocks has very kindly said that one of the “senior sources” in this story was in fact him. See this post on my blog:

http://nickreynoldsatwork.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/i-hate-senior-sources/

NB I work for the BBC but the views expressed on my personal blog are my own.

Reply

4 Adrian Monck June 1, 2008 at 13:54

@Dave Not much likelihood of that…see below
@Nigel Take a look at this study of why there are so few women consultants in the NHS…

“Analyses of career preferences and intentions suggest that disproportionate promotion cannot readily be explained as differential choice by women…there is evidence in some cases of disproportionate promotion that is best interpreted as direct or indirect discrimination.”

@Nick Thanks for the heads up on your blog. Surprised to see PH put his name to this: “Because of the intensive nature of TV news, there are fewer senior female correspondents…” See NHS study above. An argument for a little Norwegian-style encouragement?

To re-cap my argument above:

1. Women get a rough deal out of the news business.
2. Anonymous complaints that an editor only uses the people that the selection system has placed at the front of the queue are missing the point.

Reply

5 Adrian Monck June 1, 2008 at 13:58

@Nigel Oops. The study url

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: