http://adrianmonck.com/2008/07/newspapers-and-google-stockholm-syndrome/ views on the news business Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:58:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://adrianmonck.com/2008/07/newspapers-and-google-stockholm-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-887 Is Digg looking to sell to The Guardian? « slewfootsnoop Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:31:10 +0000 http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1088#comment-887 [...] suggestion sparked good debate, with some in the industry betraying a surprising propensity toward Marxist thought – ownership of the means [...] […] suggestion sparked good debate, with some in the industry betraying a surprising propensity toward Marxist thought – ownership of the means […]

]]> http://adrianmonck.com/2008/07/newspapers-and-google-stockholm-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-867 Wordblog » Blog Archive » Jarvis stirs up debate over function of newspapers Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:56:04 +0000 http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1088#comment-867 [...] debate develops the Jarvis’s argument become clearer, as in this: LATER STILL: Adrian Monck fears that we’re setting up journalists as merely suppliers and then — as he knows from the TV biz [...] […] debate develops the Jarvis’s argument become clearer, as in this: LATER STILL: Adrian Monck fears that we’re setting up journalists as merely suppliers and then — as he knows from the TV biz […]

]]> http://adrianmonck.com/2008/07/newspapers-and-google-stockholm-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-866 BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » Google as the new pressroom Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:20:16 +0000 http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1088#comment-866 [...] LATER STILL: Adrian Monck fears that we’re setting up journalists as merely suppliers and then — as he knows from the [...] […] LATER STILL: Adrian Monck fears that we’re setting up journalists as merely suppliers and then — as he knows from the […]

]]> http://adrianmonck.com/2008/07/newspapers-and-google-stockholm-syndrome/comment-page-1/#comment-864 Jeff Jarvis Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:15:13 +0000 http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1088#comment-864 Fair fear. But I"m not saying that they merely supply a Google site. They still have a site. Google just runs the technology as the backshop. The brand, content, ads, and relationships would still be the paper's. Fair fear. But I”m not saying that they merely supply a Google site. They still have a site. Google just runs the technology as the backshop. The brand, content, ads, and relationships would still be the paper’s.

]]>