The gap left by the Fairfax strike

In 1945, soci­olo­gist Bern­ard Ber­el­son took advant­age of a news­pa­per deliv­ery strike in New York to do some research, later pub­lished as What ‘Miss­ing The News­pa­per’ Means.

With 500 Aus­sie journos on strike (see their web­site), I thought it might be instruct­ive to revisit a few of Berelson’s obser­va­tions, to see how they held up today. Con­tinue read­ing

Propaganda’ on the Beeb

Over at the BBC, Nic­ola Meyr­ick steps up to defend Ana­lysis from 7 August 2008, Al-Qaeda’s Enemy Within, against the claim from a doc­u­ment leaked to the Guard­ian that sug­ges­ted the pro­gramme was inspired by a gov­ern­ment inform­a­tion unit. Con­tinue read­ing

Collective complicity

Thanks to WW2, one of the moral talk­ing points of the past cen­tury was the col­lect­ive com­pli­city of cit­izens and cultures.

In this cen­tury, the argu­ments over col­lect­ive com­pli­city will come less from our civic activ­it­ies, than from our con­sump­tion and invest­ment decisions.

What does all this have to do with the news busi­ness? Noth­ing and everything.

Information and understanding

This is my favour­ite quote from one of the books I’ve been read­ing over the vaca­tion, Hans Chris­tian von Baeyer’s Inform­a­tion: The New Lan­guage of Sci­ence:

Why does nature seem gran­u­lar, dis­con­tinu­ous, quant­ized into dis­crete chunks like sand — instead of smooth and con­tinu­ous like water?

The answer is that while we have no idea how the world is really arranged, and shouldn’t even ask, we do know that know­ledge of the world is inform­a­tion; and since inform­a­tion is nat­ur­ally quant­ized into bits, the world also appears quantized.

If it didn’t, we wouldn’t be able to under­stand it.