Unrequired Reading {21.9.08 to 22.9.08}

September 22, 2008

This is some of what’s caught my atten­tion of late:

  • Lit­er­ary licence and le Carré | Times Online — “I write this in sor­row rather than anger. Mr Liddle says so many kind things about my work. He is an eru­dite and per­cept­ive con­ver­sa­tion part­ner. We passed a con­vivial even­ing together and I would not be tak­ing either him or his edit­ors to task, were not the dis­tor­tions they have imposed on my words so poten­tially dam­aging to my repu­ta­tion, and to the opin­ion of my read­ers inside and out­side America.”
  • Is the Wall Street Journal los­ing the plot? | guardian.co.uk — “WSJ.com is clearly try­ing to attract a more gen­eral, more cas­ual, non-paying read­er­ship – people like you. It cer­tainly looks nicer, but it also looks more like any other news­pa­per site. The prob­lem is that it feels a lot slower, which is bad for the pro­fes­sional, information-seeking read­er­ship – people like me. Any­body who thinks we’re pay­ing $119 a year for pretty pic­tures has lost the plot.”
  • Ofcom PSB review: 4Subsidy | Ofcom­watch — “Ofcom’s ‘will­ing­ness to pay’ research was pretty weak, and there is no sug­ges­tion that the gov­ern­ment has a ‘will­ing­ness to tax’ for PSB pro­mo­tion in these hard eco­nomic times.  I would really be stunned if Ofcom were able to con­vince the gov­ern­ment that any new appro­pri­ation of pub­lic funds is war­ran­ted.  So, the BBC licence fee remains a target.”
  • The Great Repri­cing | Tom Glo­cer — “[G]reat empires (think Roman or Brit­ish) ulti­mately fail not as a res­ult of a decis­ive mil­it­ary loss, but because their power­ful eco­nom­ies even­tu­ally become over-extended.  If this is true, the US eco­nomy will need to be re-invented to avoid a sim­ilar fate for the last super-power.”
  • Word­Press Developer’s Tool­box | Smash­ing Magazine — What it says…
  • Amid Mar­ket Tur­moil, Some Journ­al­ists Try to Tone Down Emo­tion | NYTimes.com — This year, the media have been accused of con­trib­ut­ing to the col­lapse of both Bear Ste­arns and IndyMac, a large Cali­for­nia thrift, so journ­al­ists are more aware of the risk of stok­ing fear — and the risk of being blamed.
  • The Bank Surge | David Wein­ber­ger — The informed pub­lic writes: “Since I lack the edu­ca­tion and back­ground to under­stand the crisis and its con­text, I find myself thrown into rud­der­less think­ing, where I find myself swayed by people who I already tend to agree with (= Krug­man), who are able to pain a coher­ent pic­ture, and whose broad premises seem in line with mine.”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: