<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can audiences ever be wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adrianmonck.com/2008/10/can-audiences-ever-be-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/10/can-audiences-ever-be-wrong/</link>
	<description>a blog about news and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/10/can-audiences-ever-be-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1784#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>A few further thoughts...

... I didn&#039;t mean to suggest that anyone who is offended by the Brand / Ross calls is prudish...just that people who were offended by the Janet Jackson episode were unfairly labeled as such.

Reasonable people will disagree...

And -- what about this one?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/feb/25/uk.media

That was never aired because -- in C4&#039;s opinion -- it violated the broadcast code... what a shame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few further thoughts…</p>
<p>… I didn’t mean to suggest that anyone who is offended by the Brand / Ross calls is prudish…just that people who were offended by the Janet Jackson episode were unfairly labeled as such.</p>
<p>Reasonable people will disagree…</p>
<p>And — what about this one?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/feb/25/uk.media" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2007/feb/25/uk.media</a></p>
<p>That was never aired because — in C4’s opinion — it violated the broadcast code… what a shame…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/10/can-audiences-ever-be-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1784#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>And it was U.K. media policy types who said the U.S. people were prudish over the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction at the Super Bowl half-time show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it was U.K. media policy types who said the U.S. people were prudish over the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction at the Super Bowl half-time show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob McCauley</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/10/can-audiences-ever-be-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob McCauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1784#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 21 and i agree with this article....The media should take into a account the younger generations opinion on this issue. Jonathan Ross and Russel Brand are my favourite comics in the media today, although i agree that the other day&#039;s actions were inappropriate, i do not agree with the word &quot;abuse&quot; that is often used! The way i look at it is Jonathan said something that he would find funny ( clearly other people would to) and you could tell that he regretted it immediatley, if he would have faltered straight away he would have betrayed his cheeky chappie image and as for Russel we all know that he just breathed in and carried on. I can&#039;t believe that they intended to cause such uproar and let&#039;s face it ...the media has been looking for an oportunity to grab jonathan ever since the 18 million contract...... which is bang out of order.........PUBLIC APOLOGY that is all that should happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m 21 and i agree with this article.…The media should take into a account the younger generations opinion on this issue. Jonathan Ross and Russel Brand are my favourite comics in the media today, although i agree that the other day’s actions were inappropriate, i do not agree with the word “abuse” that is often used! The way i look at it is Jonathan said something that he would find funny ( clearly other people would to) and you could tell that he regretted it immediatley, if he would have faltered straight away he would have betrayed his cheeky chappie image and as for Russel we all know that he just breathed in and carried on. I can’t believe that they intended to cause such uproar and let’s face it …the media has been looking for an oportunity to grab jonathan ever since the 18 million contract.….. which is bang out of order.….….PUBLIC APOLOGY that is all that should happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

