The normally thorough Howard Kurtz has a piece running entitled Press May Own a Share in Financial Mess. A flavour?
PBS’s David Brancaccio says that “we journalists have had a long history with accepting what the smart people hand down to us, especially on complicated stuff… . When I would cover these very issues about problems with regulation, problems with ‘is this a disaster waiting to happen?’ people would say: ‘Well, young man, you don’t have an MBA like I do. Trust us. We went to business school.’”
Well, duh! If instead of this type of fare you want a reasoned - albeit dry - explanation of business journalism’s role in boom and bust cycles, then please read The Bubble and the Media [pdf] by Alex Dyck and Luigi Zingales. Written back in 2002, the abstract tells it all:
We argue that corporate reporters have strong incentives to enter into a quid pro quo relationship with their sources, where they receive private information in exchange for a positive spin on companies’ news. Since the value of this relationship is higher during booms, so, too, will the pro-company bias.
Incidentally, you can read Zingales on the Paulson plan here.
Hi, Adrian here. If you're new to this blog, please consider subscribing to my RSS feed, or keeping up on twitter
- Tweet • Delicious • Digg • StumbleUpon • Google Bookmarks
