Unrequired Reading {15.10.08}

October 16, 2008

Unrequired ReadingThese are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • Lower your news­pa­per expect­a­tions — now — “Wall Street Journal Man­aging Editor Robert Thom­son respon­ded to the ques­tion of whether news­pa­pers should be run as non-profit entit­ies to help them survive:

    I think it’s fair to say that a lot of news­pa­pers already were not for profit.””

  • THE LAST QE2 TRANSATLANTIC CROSSING — In which Juan has an idea and gets his reward not from news­pa­pers but dir­ect: “Cunard liked my blog very much and one day I got a phone call phone from my travel agent with the BIG NEWS.

    From a very cheap cabin we were upgraded to a Q2 suite in the top of the ship!”

  • Ally Palmer Inter­view: Smal­ler news­pa­pers have to be smarter | Gar­cia blog — “There’s no doubt that we’re work­ing in an industry which is, for the most part, man­aging decline, but there’s also no doubt that print still has a place in the mod­ern media landscape.

We are see­ing news­pa­pers pro­duced by fewer and fewer journ­al­ists, which is wor­ry­ing — but small can some­times be better.”
  • Tribune’s Lee Abrams: ‘Some People Didn’t Get It, and They’re Gone’ | Jeff Ber­cov­ici — “There was a big myth that you could not have these [news­room] cuts that were going through and still pro­duce a qual­ity news­pa­per, and that’s just nonsense.…We’ve been through some pretty sub­stan­tial cuts, and there were people who thought, “No, it’s going to be hor­rible, you just can’t do it, it’s going to be dumbed down.” And no, it just had to be rethought. It’s just as intel­li­gent and enga­ging as ever, just with fewer people.”
  • Gold­man Sachs to News­pa­pers: We See Signs of Life | E&P — “Gold­man believes it may take another five years for online rev­enue to to fully off­set declines in print.” Really.
  • Open Know­ledge Found­a­tion Wiki — , from socio-economic data to legal mater­ial. Recent tech­no­lo­gies allow this inform­a­tion to be explored, built upon and made access­ible in new ways — whether through visual rep­res­ent­a­tion, semantic inter­link­ing, or through social media applic­a­tions.
    This informal, hands-on work­shop will bring gov­ern­ment inform­a­tion experts together with those who are inter­ested in find­ing and re-using gov­ern­ment inform­a­tion. In addi­tion to focused dis­cus­sions about legal and tech­no­lo­gical aspects of re-use, gov­ern­ment inform­a­tion assets will be doc­u­mented and tagged on CKAN, a registry of know­ledge resources.
  • Media facing ‘carnage’, warns Guard­ian News & Media’s Emily Bell | guardian.co.uk — “We are on the brink of two years of carnage for west­ern media. In the UK, five nation­als could go out of busi­ness and we could be left with no UK-owned broad­caster out­side of the BBC,” she said last night.
  • Why pub­lic own­er­ship is a failed model | FT.com — Now he tells us: “I have served on the boards of vari­ous pub­lic com­pan­ies for more than 20 years and most such con­structs were dys­func­tional. Interests were not aligned and there was more focus on point­less, ritual cor­por­ate activ­ity than under­ly­ing prof­it­ab­il­ity and pro­ductiv­ity. Every­one tries hard, but the dis­con­nect between man­age­ment and ulti­mate own­er­ship leads to the pro­found issues our eco­nomy now faces.”
  • Some words on the future from my 5th anniversary address | mySo­ci­ety — “[W]e know from the con­tin­ued influ­ence of news­pa­pers, some born in the 19th cen­tury, that polit­ical media needs longev­ity to gain the reach and legit­im­acy required to trans­form whole sys­tems and to chal­lenge the expect­a­tions of whole pop­u­la­tions. mySo­ci­ety needs to work out how to be here not just in 6 months, but in 20 years.”
  • Credit crunch: how we respon­ded | Dad­b­log — “News Aggreg­at­ors are a growth industry (well, duh). Google News dom­in­ates (well, duh). But News­Now still gets 23 per cent of this traffic (well…oh, actu­ally, that’s quite inter­est­ing). Money fact: news aggreg­at­ors only send 27 per­cent of their traffic on to news sites. The biggest bene­fi­ciary of news aggreg­ator refer­rals is…. Google.”
  • Not a Great Depres­sion, a Great Rebal­an­cing | Umair Haque — “To rebal­ance the value equa­tion of debt and equity, our chal­lenge is to build a fin­an­cial sys­tem where equity can also add value to cor­por­a­tions, instead of being simply a bur­den­some tax man­agers reluct­antly pay to access cap­ital. To do that, we have to reduce and reverse the costs that make equity rel­at­ively unat­tract­ive in the first place.

    That means bet­ter mech­an­isms for man­agers to com­mu­nic­ate inform­a­tion to mar­kets. Why do we rely on heav­ily foot­noted reports issued once a year in a world mov­ing at light­speed? When Yahoo fin­ance chat­rooms reg­u­larly move mar­kets, it’s a clear sig­nal that the inform­a­tional inter­face between man­agers and mar­kets is in a state of ter­minal obsolescence.”

  • Post-Meltdown Myth­o­lo­gies (I): Amer­ic­ans Have Been Liv­ing Bey­ond Their Means | Robert Reich — “Since the year 2000, median fam­ily income has been drop­ping, adjus­ted for infla­tion. One of the main reas­ons the typ­ical fam­ily has taken on more debt has been to main­tain its liv­ing stand­ards in the face of these declin­ing real incomes.

    It’s not as if the typ­ical fam­ily sud­denly went on a spend­ing binge — buy­ing yachts and fancy cars and tak­ing ocean cruises. No, the typ­ical fam­ily just tried to keep going as it had before. But with real incomes drop­ping, and the costs of neces­sit­ies like gas, heat­ing oil, food, health insur­ance, and even col­lege tuitions all soar­ing, the only way to keep going as before was to bor­row more. You might see this as a moral fail­ure, but I think it’s more accur­ate to view it as an ongo­ing struggle to stay afloat when the boat’s sinking.”

  • How Come Brit­ish Fin­an­cial Journ­al­ism Is Such a Hit In The US? — “Through this year the Eco­nom­ist has seen its ad pages grow 5.9% attract­ing 69 new advert­isers. Com­pare those ad pages to For­bes Magazine where they are not only down 18.5% but now the Eco­nom­ist is lead­ing it by 12 pages on the year. In the more gen­eral news weekly field the Eco­nom­ist ad page account is well ahead of Time Magazine that has seen a 21% fall this year.  
    On the cir­cu­la­tion front, how­ever, the Eco­nom­ist still has a long way to go. Time, New­s­week and US News & World Report together have just under 8 mil­lion cir­cu­la­tion whereas at the Eco­nom­ist it is around 750,000. But that is still around a 50% increase over the past five years – not bad con­sid­er­ing this was the time of declin­ing cir­cu­la­tions for so many magazines.”
  • The revolu­tion of paper­less paper | BBC NEWS — “At Plastic Logic’s fact­ory in Dresden, Brit­ish engin­eer Dean Baker shows me a new kind of news­pa­per.
    What’s new about it? Well, for a start there’s no paper — it’s elec­tronic.
    The device looks just like a table mat, it’s as light as a magazine.
    But onto it you can down­load hun­dreds of news­pa­pers and — at the touch of a but­ton — browse through them quite safely, without elbow­ing any­one ever again.”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: