Unrequired Reading {29.10.08}

October 30, 2008

Unrequired ReadingThese are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • Never let it be said news must be “new&#8221 | Charles Arthur — “‘[N]ews is what the reader doesn’t yet know, but you can per­suade them they want to’. Doesn’t mat­ter if it’s ten minutes, ten days or ten years (even ten dec­ades) old. Look at how the Sunday Times held its George Osborne/Mandelson/yacht story for weeks, wait­ing for the right angle — or time — to come along.

    It’s easy to for­get that it’s not always about get­ting the news to people instantly. If the Ross/Brand story had gone onto the Mail’s site on the Sat­urday even­ing after it went out, what could it have writ­ten? “Comic makes offens­ive joke”? Some­times these things need to stew a bit. News is some­times instant. But some­times, it tastes bet­ter cooked slow.

    Which isn’t an argu­ment for not then get­ting it up on your web­site and telling the world about it. Only for not mis­tak­ing instant­aneity with impact.”

  • Too little, too late | FT.com — “The decision to use the offens­ive con­tent is a ser­i­ous con­cern. Either the edit­or­ial policy guidelines are not robust enough; or they were fol­lowed by pro­du­cers con­sid­er­ing the views of the self-selecting audi­ence for the pro­gramme rather than those of licence fee pay­ers in gen­eral; or they were not fol­lowed. Some­thing needs to change.

    The big­ger ques­tion is why a pub­lic ser­vice broad­caster, with a mis­sion to dif­fer from com­mer­cial media, was deal­ing with this rub­bish at all.”

  • Nets­cape co-founder: shut off the print edi­tion right now | forum4editors — “Shut off the print edi­tion right now. You’ve got to play offense. You’ve got to do what Intel did in ’85 when it was get­ting killed by the Japan­ese in memory chips, which was its dom­in­ant busi­ness. And it fam­ously killed the business—shut it off and focused on its much smal­ler busi­ness, micro­pro­cessors, because that was going to be the mar­ket of the future. And the minute Intel got out of play­ing defense and into play­ing offense, its future was secure. The news­pa­per com­pan­ies have to do exactly the same thing.

    The fin­an­cial mar­kets have dis­coun­ted for­ward to the ter­minal con­clu­sion for news­pa­pers, which is basic­ally bankruptcy.”

  • Shock: Drudge loses his grip on US media! | FT.com — “Just as Fleet Street swings left and right polit­ic­ally, depend­ing on where it sees its com­mer­cial advant­age, the US media have shif­ted left for a time, to mimic what they judge to be the country’s mood. When that mood swings back, so will the media.

    In prin­ciple, the Repub­lic­ans should appre­ci­ate this, for it is a tri­umph of the mar­ket over mono­poly con­trol. Or, as the Drudge Report might put it: ‘MEDIA ATTACK THEMSELVES! … DEVELOPING.’”

  • Marc Andreessen Q & A | Portfolio.com — “[Qik] will turn every phone that con­tains a cam­era into a source of stream­ing video and audio [which works bet­ter in a faster browser like Chrome]. Any­body can watch live, and then it can all get recor­ded. It’s almost the reverse of George Orwell. In 1984, the gov­ern­ment had cam­eras moun­ted every­where. In a Qik-based world, it’s the exact oppos­ite. Lit­er­ally, every­body on the planet is going to be stream­ing video.

    Qik raises some issues, like what if 10,000 people at a con­cert all broad­cast the show live?
    About a year ago, we went to see one of the major sports leagues—I won’t men­tion which one. We presen­ted how they can have social net­works and users can post videos shot at games and pho­tos and all this stuff. And the main topic of con­ver­sa­tion was how they could pre­vent people from record­ing video with their mobile phones and post­ing it online.”

  • Cir­cu­la­tion: Worse than you think | Reflec­tions of a News­o­saur — “While news­pa­per cir­cu­la­tion has weakened since the 1980s, the decay has accel­er­ated sharply since 2003. Sunday cir­cu­la­tion, which had been rel­at­ively more resi­li­ent than daily sales, now is fall­ing more pre­cip­it­ously than daily sales.

    Today’s daily cir­cu­la­tion is back to where it was in 1945 and the Sunday sale is where it was in 1965.

    Though cir­cu­la­tion is at pre-Baby Boom levels, the U.S. pop­u­la­tion has more than doubled since the mid-1940s. If you divide cir­cu­la­tion by pop­u­la­tion, you will find that fewer than 18 out of 100 Amer­ic­ans today buy a daily or Sunday newspaper.”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: