<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good journalism&#8217;s demand &#8216;problem&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adrianmonck.com/2008/11/good-journalisms-demand-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/11/good-journalisms-demand-problem/</link>
	<description>views on the news business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morning Links: November 24, 2008 &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab &#187; Pushing to the Future of Journalism</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/11/good-journalisms-demand-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning Links: November 24, 2008 &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab &#187; Pushing to the Future of Journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1989#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>[...] Adrian Monck has a worthy retort to this piece in CJR decrying &#8220;Journalism’s battle for relevance in an age of too much [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Adrian Monck has a worthy retort to this piece in <span class="caps">CJR</span> decrying &#8220;Journalism’s battle for relevance in an age of too much&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara Pawson</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/11/good-journalisms-demand-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1585</link>
		<dc:creator>Lara Pawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1989#comment-1585</guid>
		<description>(or more about me...?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(or more about&nbsp;me&#8230;?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lara Pawson</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/11/good-journalisms-demand-problem/comment-page-1/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>Lara Pawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=1989#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always found Foreign Affairs incredibly dull. Perhaps I should spend more time in the supermarket? Tell me, Adrian, who is the elite? I know plenty of elites who seem to be remarkably poorly informed. Who are you referring to? And what do they read? 

And anyway, what&#039;s wrong with just picking up a bloody book? Or going out there and finding out for yourself - my preferred method?

But a final question. Why is it that in the USA there are loads of quality journals and here, in the UK, we have extremely little. We&#039;ve got the LRB... and what else? Why don&#039;t we have a New Yorker equivalent or a New York Review of Books (still better than the LRB, I&#039;m afraid) or a Nation? Does this say more about our audiences or more about the market, or both?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found Foreign Affairs incredibly dull. Perhaps I should spend more time in the supermarket? Tell me, Adrian, who is the elite? I know plenty of elites who seem to be remarkably poorly informed. Who are you referring to? And what do they&nbsp;read? </p>
<p>And anyway, what&#8217;s wrong with just picking up a bloody book? Or going out there and finding out for yourself - my preferred&nbsp;method?</p>
<p>But a final question. Why is it that in the <span class="caps">USA</span> there are loads of quality journals and here, in the <span class="caps">UK</span>, we have extremely little. We&#8217;ve got the <span class="caps">LRB</span>&#8230; and what else? Why don&#8217;t we have a New Yorker equivalent or a New York Review of Books (still better than the <span class="caps">LRB</span>, I&#8217;m afraid) or a Nation? Does this say more about our audiences or more about the market, or&nbsp;both?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
