Preserving journalism

Castle HowardListen hard. You too may be able to hear the mel­an­choly, long, with­draw­ing roar that Sophocles heard long ago on the Aegean.

A few years ago I did an MBA. One of my goals was to try and find a sus­tain­able busi­ness model for some­thing I had given my life to — tele­vi­sion news. You’ll not be sur­prised to learn that it proved a rather fruit­less search for a means of preservation.

To pre­serve things, of course, is to change them. Eng­lish coun­try houses, once the cor­por­ate HQs of ancien agri-businesses, are now tour­ist traps. They are stripped of the people that made them power­ful human insti­tu­tions — they exist now entirely as arte­facts, their waxed oak boards and grand stair­cases walked for the passing won­der of a wet after­noon.

Pre­ser­va­tion pre­served neither the aris­to­cracy, nor their ten­ants and trades­men, nor the ser­vants who served them. Cher­ished fam­ily tra­di­tions per­ished. Pews in par­ish churches went unfilled.

But the build­ings still stand. And uncon­sec­rated chapels still get visitors.

So when we talk about new busi­ness mod­els for journ­al­ism, let’s not fool ourselves. What is that we want to pre­serve? And what will be left at the end of the process?

3 thoughts on “Preserving journalism

  1. Per­haps we should instead say, “new busi­nesses for news.” There are new enter­prises devoted to new out there (I had almost a dozen present at my con­fab on new busi­ness mod­els for news) and they spring from new worldviews.

  2. The way I’m com­ing to think of it is — how do we cap­ture or replace the pop­u­lar pub­lic inform­a­tion, watch­dog and whis­tleblow­ing func­tions that were (accord­ing to the news­pa­per the­ory of demo­cracy) the province of declin­ing news media?

    The most instruct­ive example for me of the very real prob­lems these suc­cessors will encounter going for­ward is Wikileaks and its prob­lems com­ing up with a role/relationship with pub­lic and press.

    Ulti­mately I think govts are going to have to make media win­ners knuckle down to become news pro­viders, and they’ll provide news/information ser­vices as grudgingly as TV net­works cur­rently do.

  3. When I star­ted the Journ­al­ism Lead­ers Course at UCLAN last year, I had a very sim­ilar goal (although not for tele­vi­sion news).
    But the more I searched for a way to pre­serve journ­al­ism, the more I real­ised I’d never really ques­tioned what it was.
    Fur­ther­more, I’d never prop­erly ques­tioned why it might be wanted or needed.
    It was very unpleas­ant to start decon­struct­ing a pro­fes­sion I am so pas­sion­ate about, but it was also use­ful to be faced with some home truths.
    I cer­tainly don’t have any clear vis­ion of my future yet, but I know that what I might be able to make money out of and what I want to pre­serve are very dif­fer­ent.
    The scary thing is that in many cases they are actu­ally mutu­ally exclus­ive.
    My pas­sion is, I think, romantic and ideal­istic: I admire the investigative/research side of journ­al­ism — the chance to serve read­ers by high­light­ing import­ant issues.
    I also love the idea of present­ing that research in enga­ging and innov­at­ive ways.
    But, if I’m hon­est, I’ve not had a chance to do much of that.
    Most people do not need journ­al­ists pro­du­cing in-depth reports in order to live their lives.
    They need enter­tain­ment and they need inform­a­tion, but that already exists without our cur­rent concept of journ­al­ism. It just needs someone to organ­ise what’s out there and put into a con­veni­ent and access­ible format.
    News busi­nesses also do not need journ­al­ists in order to make money.
    People who have to make phonecalls and do inter­views are, in essence, an unne­ces­sary over­head.
    There are busi­nesses that have already done these cal­cu­la­tions and decided it makes bet­ter busi­ness sense to just re-write from press releases pub­lished online.
    So in an increas­ingly efficiency-driven world, I sup­pose my ideal­ised ver­sion of journ­al­ism becomes a very dif­fer­ent product to the one that can be pro­duced by a lean, information-compiling busi­ness.
    It also has a very dif­fer­ent value pro­positon and a dif­fer­ent mar­ket. Per­haps it’s not unlike agri­cul­ture — you have one or two very big play­ers serving the mass mar­ket and then you have the break­away small­hold­ers who pro­duce spe­cial­ist food for more defined sectors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>