Unrequired Reading {13.11.08}

Unrequired ReadingThese are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • Why Indian media isn’t influ­en­cing voter turnout | livemint.com — “A look at voter turnout trends in the last four Par­lia­ment elec­tions and also data on voter turnout in some assembly elec­tions, includ­ing Delhi, Uttar Pra­desh and the most recent elec­tions held in Karnataka, viewed in light of sharp increases in tele­vi­sion audi­ences and news­pa­per read­ers dur­ing the same period leads to one start­ling con­clu­sion: There appears to be very low cor­rel­a­tion between Indian voter turnout and grow­ing media—and pre­sum­ably information—sources.”
  • Signs you may be get­ting fired from your media job | 10,000 Words — “1. Your com­puter has been replaced by a Speak and Spell.
    2. There is now a boun­cer out­side the news­room door.
    3. Your phone calls are for­war­ded to a call cen­ter in India.
    4. Your boss just stole your stapler…

    I was sav­ing this post to assuage journ­al­ists who have been caught in the wave of lay­offs, but iron­ic­ally I myself have just been laid off from my job as part of Time Inc.‘s massive restructuring.”

  • Blo­go­nom­ics: Is it the End of Microp­ub­lish­ing? | Seek­ing Alpha — The dream of inter­net pub­lish­ers was that media buy­ers would flock to a more niche medium, where they could tar­get people much more accur­ately. But the prob­lem is that media buy­ers, and ad sales people, get paid a lot of money: it’s just not worth their while to col­lab­or­ate on a cam­paign which only reaches a rel­at­ive hand­ful of read­ers. To be suc­cess­ful in pub­lish­ing, you need eco­nom­ies of scale, and that means big web­sites with a mass audi­ence rather than niche blogs which need to be sold sep­ar­ately by expens­ive sales teams.
  • Hits just don’t keep on com­ing; Mar­keters of CDs expand rep­er­tory | Con­tentA­genda — “To off­set this decline, the exec­ut­ives behind the albums are expand­ing the basic product line. They have intro­duced a series of sup­ple­mental CDs, like ”Now That’s What I Call Coun­try,” and are mov­ing into an array of media.

    New CDs will allow access to a Web site fea­tur­ing acts below the usual super­star radar, and a deal with Dada, a cellphone-services com­pany, will offer extra pro­mo­tion of songs and ring tones from ”Now” artists.

    In addi­tion, the ”Now” team is in talks to cre­ate a net­work tele­vi­sion show to high­light its acts, accord­ing to people close to the nego­ti­ations who were not author­ized to speak publicly.

    ”Now” exec­ut­ives declined to com­ment on plans for a tele­vi­sion show, but acknow­ledged that the new pro­jects were part of a broad effort to stem losses. ”We’re try­ing to make up for lost volume in the mar­ket­place,” Mer­cer said.”

  • Spin, Hype, and a Hoax Involving “Joe the Plumber” | Cen­ter for Media and Demo­cracy — From a month ago: “In all like­li­hood, “Mar­tin Eis­en­stadt” is some kind of left­ist prank­ster who sees his hoax as a satire.”
  • The­ory (of all things) Can Shed Light on Jarvis/Rosenbaum Dus­tup | chan­ging­news­room — “News­pa­pers are still put­ting out a print product every day, and the routines that make it pos­sible for them to man­age chaos and pro­duce the daily mir­acle on dead trees each morn­ing are notori­ously hard to change partly just because they do WORK to make that pos­sible. People who have built up power and status in a par­tic­u­lar spe­cialty are scared of change that calls the know­ledge and exper­i­ence that got them there irrel­ev­ant. Under­ly­ing assump­tions about the import­ance of hier­archy and the rel­at­ive prestige in print are still oper­at­ing. Pub­lish­ers short­sightedly cut resources. Most main­stream media journ­al­ists are work­ing long hours just try­ing to stay afloat with a massively increased workload.

    These sys­temic issues are not insur­mount­able. The key, though, is to stop see­ing this as a “I get it, you don’t” envir­on­ment and start work­ing at the organ­iz­a­tional level to identify spe­cific imped­i­ments to change and col­lect­ive solutions.”

  • A Life In Media | Forbes.com — I’m proud … of hav­ing fought a war in North Korea as one of Cap­tain John Chafee’s rifle pla­toon lead­ers; of hav­ing done good work as a reporter; held some great jobs; being hired by Roger Ailes when I was 67 for CNBC (doing power lunch inter­views at the Four Sea­sons res­taur­ant); going on air at CBS dur­ing Paley’s time; get­ting to know Irwin Shaw, Mailer, Von­negut, Joe Heller; work­ing for extraordin­ary bosses–Murdoch, John Fairchild, Tom Murphy, Wal­ter Ander­son of Parade and his boss S.I. New­house, Felker, and now for Steve Forbes.”
  • Dacre on pri­vacy and more | Andrew Scott — “This is an import­ant speech. It raises ques­tions over (a) the alloc­a­tion of cases in the High Court, and (b) the appro­pri­ate­ness of ask­ing judges alone to determ­ine how the frame­work within which journ­al­ists oper­ate should be fash­ioned. The irony of course, is that after dec­ades of ward­ing off legis­lat­ive inter­en­tion, news­pa­per exec­ut­ives seem now to be mak­ing a plea for Par­lia­ment­ary intervention.”
  • Nigeria: Man, at 76, Enrolls for Journ­al­ism Course | allAfrica.com — “Mr Clem­ent wishes to prac­tice as a journ­al­ist after his edu­ca­tion if only he would be given the oppor­tun­ity to do so irre­spect­ive of his age.”
  • The role of cit­izen journ­al­ism in mod­ern demo­cracy | Helen Boaden — “I am incred­ibly proud of the Edit­ors’ Blog and of my team for being open and trans­par­ent with the public.

    But as time has gone on, it’s clear that in one respect at least, this is a double edged sword. Call us para­noid, but we increas­ingly have a sneak­ing sus­pi­cion that some of our com­pet­it­ors in the news­pa­per industry pore over our Edit­ors’ Blog to try to pick out phrases and opin­ions to turn into crit­ical copy.

    This doesn’t remotely put us off doing it — but it cer­tainly makes us very real­istic about the risks and bene­fits of trans­par­ency. Indeed, I long for the day when the editor of a major news­pa­per — espe­cially a tabloid — writes the occa­sional blog hon­estly out­lining the reas­ons behind his or her edit­or­ial decisions.”

  • News­pa­pers see oppor­tun­it­ies in Web video — “Neil Thur­man, a senior lec­turer at City Uni­ver­sity London’s Depart­ment of Journ­al­ism, has just released a new report with the con­clu­sion that news­pa­per edit­ors believe that adding video to their web­sites provides “huge oppor­tun­it­ies” to increase rev­en­ues as TV ad spend moves online.”
  • The Edited Palin: Can Journ­al­ism Be Too Object­ive? | DataMin­ing — “[O]né thing I’ve noticed more and more is the use of ver­batim tran­scripts includ­ing mis­speak­ing and repairs. Tra­di­tion­ally, Bush has been an easy tar­get for this, but Palin is another example. Take this recent CNN art­icle “Palin says she doesn’t regret Couric inter­view” which includes:

    Cer­tainly I should have done the inter­view. And to attrib­ute I think that inter­view to any kind of neg­at­iv­ity in the cam­paign or a down­fall in the cam­paign, I think it’s ridiculous.”

    Now, does Palin speak with per­fect inelo­quence? or does the media report too lit­er­ally what is said? Couldn’t this have been reported:

    Cer­tainly I should have done the inter­view. And to attrib­ute that inter­view to any kind of neg­at­iv­ity in the cam­paign or a down­fall in the cam­paign [is] ridiculous.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>