Unrequired Reading {15.11.08 to 16.11.08}

November 16, 2008

Unrequired ReadingThese are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • Obama appoints You­Tube (Google) as Sec­ret­ary of Video | CNET News — “[W]hy should the incom­ing Pres­id­ent, or pub­lic offi­cial, favor one Inter­net video ser­vice over another? Yahoo, MSN, Blip, Veoh and other video shar­ing sites shouldn’t have to lobby the White House for equal time or at least some time. I am sure the choice of You­Tube was prac­tical, and has noth­ing to do with Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s very pub­lic sup­port of Obama.
    Impli­cit product endorse­ments are dif­fi­cult to avoid for any pub­lic offi­cial. If Obama prefers a Black­berry, Apple can’t do much to fix that prob­lem. But, Obama is rarely seen in pic­tures with his Black­berry and the New York Times reports that he is going to have to give up his favor­ite com­mu­nic­a­tions device.
    In the case of upload­ing video, the Obama team can cre­ate its own branded, video-sharing ser­vice neut­ral video player that allows any­one in the world to embed the con­tent. That might be a more equit­able way for Pres­id­ent Obama to spread his mes­sage, and he could still have a You­Tube channel.”
  • Peter Pre­ston: Tabloids must be free to offend | The Guard­ian — ‘If mass-circulation news­pa­pers, which also devote con­sid­er­able space to report­ing and ana­lysis of pub­lic affairs, don’t have the free­dom to write about scan­dal, I doubt whether they will retain their mass cir­cu­la­tions — with obvi­ous and wor­ry­ing implic­a­tions for the demo­cratic pro­cess,’ he told the Soci­ety of Editors.

    It’s a case you can put in dif­fer­ent ways. ‘To keep this squalid industry afloat, unres­tric­ted right to pub­li­cise the sex lives of oth­ers is neces­sary, so the judi­ciary must be silenced’

  • How Indus­tries Sur­vive Change. If They Do. | NYTimes.com — “[P]erhaps the destruc­tion will lead to more cre­ativ­ity. Per­haps the people we now know as journ­al­ists — or, for that mat­ter, auto­work­ers — will find ways to innov­ate else­where, just as, over a cen­tury ago, gun makers laid down their weapons and broke out the needle and thread. That is, after all, the Amer­ican cre­at­ive leg­acy: mak­ing innov­a­tion seem as easy as, well, rid­ing a bike.”
  • The Shal­low­est Gen­er­a­tion | The Big Pic­ture — “It is time to cast aside the $88,000 Range Rovers, $1,200 Jimmy Choo boots, $5,000 Rolex watches and daily double lattes at Star­bucks. It is time to live within your means, dis­tin­guish between needs and wants, reduce debt, save 10% of your income, make sure your kids get a good edu­ca­tion, not try and keep up with the Jones’, show com­pas­sion for your fel­low man,  and pos­sibly pay more taxes and get less bene­fits, for the good of the country.”
  • The Wis­dom of Geeks, The Mad­ness of Crowds | Har­vard Busi­ness Blog — “Sil­ver has, I believe, dis­covered a good method for polit­ical pre­dic­tion. You start with polls, which are now both fre­quent and widely-dispersed across the land. You take a bunch of them, cor­rect for biases of vari­ous types (e.g., con­sist­ent lean right or left, or poll­sters that don’t call mobile phones), and then run a Monte Carlo sim­u­la­tion on the out­come to see what the prob­ab­il­it­ies and con­fid­ence inter­vals are. As you can see if you look on the web­site, it res­ults in a massive amount of data, but it seems to work.”
  • We can be her­oes … | FT.com — “Monck notes that in journ­al­istic prac­tice “moral issues barely get raised at all”. He believes more in the need for journ­al­ism to reveal and explain; he wants con­tempt laws lib­er­al­ised and the secret ser­vices to be more open, so that we might bet­ter under­stand what is at stake in the war on ter­ror. If journ­al­ism is in crisis, some of the com­pon­ents of that crisis are as old as journ­al­ism itself and are indi­vis­ible from it. In this access­ible, jauntily writ­ten book, Monck ends up cer­tain that we need journ­al­ism but sees it, with affec­tion and exas­per­a­tion, as a flawed thing, which, when it does good, does so by accident.”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: