Unrequired Reading {1.12.08}

December 2, 2008

Unrequired Reading

These are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • Does Rupert Mur­doch really “des­pise” Bill O’Reilly? | Media Mat­ters — “Wolff tries to cement the deal about Murdoch’s sup­posed hatred of O’Reilly [emphasis added]:

    The embar­rass­ment can no longer be missed. [Mur­doch] mumbles even more than usual when called on to jus­tify it. He barely pre­tends to hide the way he feels about Bill O’Reilly.”

    This seems to bor­der on biographer-as-mind-reader territory.”

  • Police Treat­ment of Journ­al­ist Sparks Out­cry in France | washingtonpost.com — “The knocks on his door came at 6:40 a.m., Vit­torio de Fil­ip­pis recalled, when Paris was still dark and he was fast asleep. Three police officers — a pair of men and a woman, all wear­ing arm­bands — had come to take him in.

    By the time his ordeal ended five hours later, about 11:30 a.m. Fri­day, the journ­al­ist wrote, he had been man­handled, hand­cuffed, humi­li­ated in front of his sons, twice forced to strip and sub­mit to body cav­ity searches and inter­rog­ated without law­yers by an invest­ig­at­ing magis­trate — all over a two-year-old libel case.

    The treat­ment meted out to Fil­ip­pis, an exec­ut­ive and former editor in chief of the Paris news­pa­per Lib­er­a­tion, promp­ted an out­cry Sat­urday from his col­leagues, law­yers and other sup­port­ers, who said the tac­tics were out of place in a coun­try with long and cher­ished tra­di­tions of rule of law and free­dom of expression.”

  • Aging Not Slowed By Anti­ox­id­ants, Study Rejects 50 Year Old The­ory | Med­ical News Today — In 1956 the biogeron­to­lo­gist Den­ham Har­man pro­posed that aging was the res­ult of an accu­mu­la­tion of “oxid­at­ive stress” such as that inflic­ted on cells by free rad­ic­als. Gems and col­leagues now sug­gest this the­ory is not cor­rect and that super­ox­ide is not a major cause of aging.

    Gems said the free rad­ical the­ory of aging, which has dom­in­ated the field for over 50 years, “just doesn’t stand up to the evidence.”

  • How I Wolff’d down the Mur­doch book | Medi­afile — Michael Wolff: “[People say] this is a man who we think is a con­trol freak and a vis­ion­ary and who has had this very clear plan of dom­in­ance, and I find that not to be true at all. This is a com­pany that has been built over more than 50 years with very little vis­ion. It was a series of oppor­tun­it­ies. … I found him to be the ulti­mate city editor. Whatever happened yes­ter­day is gone.”
  • George Brock: The end of journ­al­ism | TLS — “[J]ournalism is in trouble as an idea. Does this mat­ter? The fourth estate can­not, thank good­ness, be man­aged, reformed or even con­sidered as a coher­ently organ­ized pro­fes­sion. But journ­al­ists could think more clearly than they do about how to improve the level of trust in their work. The case for the pro­fes­sion­als needs mak­ing all over again.

    With humil­ity.”

  • Chicago News and Opin­ion on The Huff­ing­ton Post — The local viewspa­per of the future?
  • News­pa­pers, Swedish detect­ives and the small print | Roger Alton — Roger Alton, blog­ger: “The Inde­pend­ent has been in the news a bit recently, and thats’s why I would like to ask any­body out there for views. What we want to do is pro­duce the sort of news­pa­per you really want.

    So please let me know the type of news or fea­tures or pic­tures or invest­ig­a­tions you would like.  Do you want  Strictly or the Large Had­ron Col­lider or Bri­tain on the Booze, or Damian Green or all of the above? I some­times think we are not  women-friendly enough in our cov­er­age. But I am a bloke and  prob­ably use­less at that, so I am ask­ing you: what could we do to become more woman-friendly?
    And I think our print product and our multi-platform web oper­a­tions — online, video, down­loads etc etc — should be closely related. I can’t get enough of our bril­liant polit­ical ana­lyst Steve Richards  –  and I mean that in a good way –  so I would like to see him all over the inter­net as well as the paper. But of course he is only human!
     
    Any­way, please let  me know below.”

  • Cap­ital Alloc­a­tion is Still King (News­pa­per Edi­tion) | Seek­ing Alpha — “Today, the Times is still con­sidered the paper of record, and dwarfs the Post in terms of daily cir­cu­la­tion (1,038,000 to 635,000). Both have suffered greatly from the decline of the news­pa­per busi­ness. Look closer at the fin­an­cials of their par­ent com­pan­ies, how­ever, and a dif­fer­ent pic­ture emerges:

    The New York Times Com­pany has a mar­ket cap­it­al­iz­a­tion of $1.08 bil­lion. The fam­ily that con­trols it, the Ochs-Sulzbergers, owns about 19% of the equity, about $206 mil­lion.
    The Wash­ing­ton Post Com­pany has a mar­ket cap­it­al­iz­a­tion of $3.7 bil­lion. The con­trolling Gra­ham family’s interest amount to at least $1.8 billion.

    How could the Gra­hams have caught up to and over­taken the Sulzber­gers when the latter’s flag­ship product con­tin­ues to be lar­ger, and both flag­ships are suf­fer­ing? The answer, in the main, is super­ior cap­ital alloc­a­tion over a period of decades.”

  • Of course we’ll have news­pa­pers. But will there be any news in them? | Nie­man Watch­dog — “Demo­cracy, and indeed, Zell’s cher­ished cap­it­al­ism, must have a vibrant and free press to sur­vive and prosper. And you are not going to get that kind of press by simply listen­ing to your cus­tomer and giv­ing him what he or she wants. That’s what Detroit did when every­one told them they wanted an SUV. And look where that got them, and all of us.

    I sus­pect that once again our future is at least in part in our past. To thrive and prosper, news­pa­pers have to fig­ure out how to deliver journ­al­ism that makes the pub­lic believe we once again are a pub­lic trust, some­thing of value and some­thing they won’t hes­it­ate to pay for.  Instead many papers today are try­ing to give read­ers enter­tain­ment, without the drama and without the laughs.”

  • State of the Blo­go­sphere 2008 — Day 2: The What And Why of Blog­ging | Tech­nor­ati — “Inter­na­tional blog­gers tend to be less con­ver­sa­tional and snarky. Asian blog­gers tend to be more motiv­a­tional and con­fes­sional, while European blog­gers are more con­front­a­tional. Women tend to be more con­ver­sa­tional in their blog­ging style, while men tend to be expert. Finally, those under 34 are more con­fes­sional in their blog­ging style, while those over 35 are more expert in their style.

    Fewer than one in five blog­gers con­sider them­selves snarky or confessional.”

  • Cub reporter sav­aged over climate-change scep­ti­cism | New Sci­ent­ist — Look­ing into Lovley’s stor­ies, I found half a dozen web­sites had already torn her report­ing to shreds includ­ing David Roberts of Grist.org who called the stor­ies “the most jaw-droppingly mor­onic stor­ies I’ve ever seen,” and char­ac­ter­ised Lovely as “the most dim­wit­ted, gull­ible reporter in DC” . Ouch…

    What do you think?  Is Politico at fault for giv­ing so much, one-sided ink to those still in denial over cli­mate change, or, did Roberts go over­board in his con­dem­na­tion of a young, cub reporter?

  • Let­ter: Ludicrous case against journ­al­ist | The Guard­ian — “It is clearly more news­worthy to be a politi­cian than a journ­al­ist, but while Damian Green had over two pages, a leader and sev­eral let­ters devoted to him (Novem­ber 29), Sally Mur­rer had to make do with a passing men­tion in the leader: “Yes­ter­day a case col­lapsed involving a local journalist”.

    Sally Mur­rer was that journ­al­ist. A 50-year-old single mother bring­ing up three chil­dren, one of them aut­istic, she was dis­grace­fully treated. She was arres­ted three times. On one occa­sion she was strip-searched and held for 36 hours in police cells. Dur­ing inter­views she was threatened with life impris­on­ment, and became so trau­mat­ised she made arrange­ments for her aut­istic child on the basis that she was going to prison.”

  • The Fatal Arrow, Shot From a Cross­bow, Struck His Chest | Vin Cros­bie — “Giron wasn’t killed because he was a journ­al­ist for the invest­ig­at­ive news­pa­per El Per­iódico , but simply because he worked for it. His widow, a pho­to­grapher, also works at the news­pa­per. They are try­ing to intim­id­ate all of the newspaper’s staff.

    Viol­ence aimed at El Per­iódico isn’t new. In 2001, 50 people armed with clubs, stones, bottles, and burn­ing news­pa­pers and rags tried to force their way into it. In 2003, a dozen gun­men raided the home of El Per­iódico pub­lisher José Rubén Zamora and threatened him. Bombs have been dis­covered under report­ers’ cars.

    I often receive tele­phone calls from friends here in the United States who tell me that they are ‘tak­ing a risk’ by chan­ging jobs from North Amer­ican news­pa­per to another. But they actu­ally have no clue what tak­ing real risks are for a journalism.”

  • Three women employ­ees sue KMBC for age and gender dis­crim­in­a­tion | kansascity.com — “There’s noth­ing wrong with being young and pretty, but if you con­sider tele­vi­sion news journ­al­ism — and I’m not quite sure that I do — you don’t really get good at that until you have sources, you’re a beat reporter, you know who to talk to and you know how the world works. And that’s not some­thing you get just by being cute.”
  • U.S. Media Thrive World­wide, but Not U.S. Image — NYTimes.com — Wait for the punch­line: “Joseph S. Nye Jr., the Har­vard pro­fessor who coined the phrase “soft power” in 1989 to refer to the ways bey­ond mil­it­ary muscle that Amer­ica influ­ences the world, said that “what’s inter­est­ing about the last eight years is that polls show a decline in Amer­ican attractiveness.”

    He added: “But then you ask the follow-up ques­tions and you see that Amer­ican cul­ture remains attract­ive, that Amer­ican val­ues remain attract­ive. Which is the oppos­ite of what the pres­id­ent has said — that they hate us for who we are and what we believe in.”

    Jef­frey Schle­singer, the head of inter­na­tional tele­vi­sion at Warner Broth­ers, had a sim­pler explan­a­tion for the pop­ular­ity of Amer­ican entertainment.

    Bat­man is Bat­man, regard­less of if Bush is in the White House or not,” he said.”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: