Unrequired Reading {15.12.08}

Unrequired Reading

These are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • How to live-Tweet an event | New Tricks — “Here are five tricks for get­ting the most out of your live Tweeting…”
  • Gael Greene — Insa­ti­able, and Also Dis­missed | NYTimes.com — “Adam Moss, New York’s editor in chief, said Ms. Greene “was laid off — there is no eleg­ant expres­sion for it” because New York could no longer afford four food crit­ics. Adam Platt is the chief weekly reviewer and Robin Rais­feld and Rob Pat­ron­ite write the Under­ground Gour­met column.”
  • Fam­ily: Shoe thrower hates both US, Iran role | The Asso­ci­ated Press — He didn’t like you either: “He was very boast­ful, arrog­ant and always show­ing off,” said Zanko Ahmed, a Kur­d­ish journ­al­ist who atten­ded a journ­al­ism train­ing course with al-Zeidi in Lebanon. “He tried to raise top­ics to show that nobody is as smart as he is.”
  • Bernie Madoff and Hamlet’s Ghost | Jeff Mat­thews — “Harry Marko­po­los, who years ago worked for a rival firm, researched Mr. Madoff’s stock-options strategy and was con­vinced the res­ults likely weren’t real.

    Madoff Secur­it­ies is the world’s largest Ponzi Scheme,” Mr. Marko­po­los, wrote in a let­ter to the U.S. Secur­it­ies and Exchange Com­mis­sion in 1999.”

  • The best sen­tence I read yes­ter­day | Tyler Cowen — “My cur­rent view is this: one’s atten­tion is extremely scarce and lim­ited, as are one’s affil­i­ations.  Inso­far as you have the lux­ury of think­ing “big­ger thoughts,” those thoughts should be dir­ec­ted at help­ing oth­ers, not at help­ing oneself.”
  • News­pa­pers can’t keep dis­trib­ut­ing con­tent for free on Web | Las Vegas Sun — About the only time I buy news­pa­pers is before board­ing planes, when digital sources will be inac­cess­ible. About the only pages I’d paid a dime for while groun­ded came to me on Nov. 5. Who could pass up the his­toric “Obama Wins” headlines?

    The bet­ter ques­tion — who in my gen­er­a­tion even real­izes the role he has played in the murder of news? Silently skim­ming off Google’s AP con­tent and other major news out­lets’ Web sites, where advert­ising tries in vain to off­set the cost of report­age, my gen­er­a­tion, and many around us, have failed to recog­nize the part each of us has played in the death of Amer­ican journalism.

    So I made a decision amid this exist­en­tial crisis. I will soon be a sub­scriber to four Amer­ican news­pa­pers: the Miami Her­ald, The Phil­adelphia Inquirer, the Rocky Moun­tain News, and the Chicago Tribune — all pub­lic­a­tions in major fin­an­cial distress.

    My moral qualms solved, the real­ity remains — what will it take? How will journ­al­ism survive?

  • News You Can Lose | The New Yorker — [P]eople don’t use the Times less than they did a dec­ade ago. They use it more. The dif­fer­ence is that today they don’t have to pay for it. The real prob­lem for news­pa­pers, in other words, isn’t the Inter­net; it’s us. We want access to everything, we want it now, and we want it for free. That’s a consumer’s dream, but even­tu­ally it’s going to col­lide with real­ity: if news­pa­pers’ profits van­ish, so will their product.
  • UK read­er­ship: class, age & sex | News­pa­per Innov­a­tion — While Metro and the Daily are very sim­ilar when social class is con­cerned, the two are very dif­fer­ent when the age pro­file of their read­ers is com­pared: 74% of Metro’s read­ers is below 45 while only 28% of the Daily Mail read­ers are in that group. More than three quar­ters of the Daily Telegraph’s read­ers are 45 or older

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>