Unrequired Reading {4.1.09 to 5.1.09}

January 5, 2009

These are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • The fore­cast for 2009: James Mont­gomery of FT.com on the eco­nomy | guardian.co.uk — “The search for new sources of rev­enue to sup­ple­ment advert­ising — from con­fer­ences, e-commerce and com­mer­cial pub­lish­ing — will intensify. Sub­scrip­tion will come back into vogue, as the ques­tion becomes: what would Apple do?”
  • Samuel Hunt­ing­ton, 81, polit­ical sci­ent­ist, dies — Inter­na­tional Her­ald Tribune — Missed this: “Samuel Hunt­ing­ton, a polit­ical sci­ent­ist best known for his the­ory of a clash of civil­iz­a­tions, died Wed­nes­day of con­gest­ive heart fail­ure and com­plic­a­tions from dia­betes, on Martha’s Vine­yard in Mas­sachu­setts, Har­vard Uni­ver­sity announced over the week­end. He was 81.”
  • Why I Avoid Blog­ging About Israel (updated) | Opinio Juris — It is sad that a post about IHL and ICL in which I spe­cific­ally avoided arguing that any of Israel’s attacks on Gaza were dis­pro­por­tion­ate — largely because, as I said, I think pro­por­tion­al­ity argu­ments are essen­tially use­less — would lead to such vit­riol.  Proof pos­it­ive that intel­li­gent dia­logue about Israel issues is nearly impossible.
  • Der­show­itz on Israel and Pro­por­tion­al­ity | Opinio Juris — Pro­por­tion­al­ity is not meas­ured by com­par­ing the num­ber of Israeli civil­ians killed by Hamas attacks to the num­ber of Hamas “ter­ror­ists” killed by Israeli attacks; it is determ­ined by com­par­ing the num­ber of Palestinian civil­ians killed by a spe­cific Israeli attack rel­at­ive to the mil­it­ary advant­age gained by that attack.  As Art­icle 51(5) of the First Addi­tional Pro­tocol says, an attack is indis­crim­in­ate — and thus pro­hib­ited by IHL — if it “may be expec­ted to cause incid­ental loss of civil­ian life, injury to civil­ians, dam­age to civil­ian objects, or a com­bin­a­tion thereof, which would be excess­ive in rela­tion to the con­crete and dir­ect mil­it­ary advant­age anti­cip­ated.”  Art­icle 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Stat­ute is worded sim­il­arly, although it requires the incid­ental dam­age be “clearly excess­ive,” not just “excess­ive.”
    Whether an Israeli attack is dis­pro­por­tion­ate, there­fore, is com­pletely inde­pend­ent of the leth­al­ity of Hamas’s attacks.
  • THE FINTAG NEWSLETTER @ 05 Janu­ary 2009 — The fin­an­cial ser­vices industry should imple­ment MOTs. This would involve once every three years (and not every year as it would slow everything down) a more detailed and thor­ough audit than the account­ants cur­rently do when sign­ing off an insti­tu­tions stat­utory fin­an­cial state­ments off every year. As we have seen, these yearly audits are a waste of time.
  • Blog­ging, a new journ­al­istic genre? | The Monday Note — Start­ing as little more than pop­u­list rants, blog­ging has already tran­scen­ded its ori­gins and grown into a fresh new journ­al­istic genre, one that is likely to become the main engine of mod­ern news sites.
  • Digg This, Huff­ing­ton Post: What’s $200 Mil­lion Now Worth? | The Media Guy — [T]here’s a resid­ual assump­tion that HuffPo must be worth at least tens of mil­lions, espe­cially given Oak’s $25 mil invest­ment for an undis­closed stake. Just after December’s Oak round, for instance, The Wall Street Journal’s “BoomTown” blog­ger Kara Swisher quoted an unnamed source who put HuffPo’s valu­ation just “south of $100 mil­lion.” Clearly those Palo Alto VCs are hop­ing that the blog’s expan­sion plans — last summer’s launch of a Chicago HuffPo edi­tion, for instance — will some day pay off.

    So how’d I come up with my $2 mil­lion figure?

  • Monmouth’s news & arts weekly | tri­CityNews — “The tri­CityNews is an altern­at­ive news­pa­per focus­ing on the arts, cul­ture and polit­ics in east­ern Mon­mouth County, New Jer­sey. Dis­tri­bu­tion is from Atlantic High­lands to Bel­mar. The tri­CityNews pub­lishes every Thursday.

    Our mis­sion is to identify and pro­mote the cre­at­ive and altern­at­ive through­out the area. We have placed par­tic­u­lar emphasis on pro­mot­ing the res­tor­a­tion of Asbury Park to its right­ful place as one of the great pro­gress­ive and mul­ti­cul­tural small cit­ies in this coun­try. In Red Bank, we advoc­ate for the cre­at­ive busi­nesses and groups which are threatened by the creep­ing con­form­ity of that town’s eco­nomic boom. And in Long Branch, we search dili­gently for a spark of cre­at­ive life, focus­ing on that city’s West End as a beacon of hope in an oth­er­wise sub­urb­an­ized water­front com­munity. And through­out the region, we uncover inter­est­ing artists, busi­nesses and char­ac­ters of all stripes.

    Why do we do it? To defeat that most per­ni­cious enemy we all face out here in suburbia.”

  • Former news­pa­per rivals coöper­ate as jobs are cut | Boston.com — Just a dozen years ago, news­pa­pers on either side of Arling­ton, Texas, fought fiercely for every reader in the fast-growing city, spend­ing mil­lions of dol­lars to expand their staffs and cover the smal­lest meet­ings and sport­ing events.

    So it came as a sur­prise that The Dal­las Morn­ing News and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram star­ted shar­ing pho­tos and con­cert reviews in November.

    But these are unpre­ced­en­ted times.

    As read­ers and advert­isers migrate to the Inter­net and the stum­bling eco­nomy cuts deeply into rev­en­ues, news organ­iz­a­tions are rede­fin­ing what it means to com­pete. In recent months, papers around the coun­try have tried to mit­ig­ate their staff cuts by for­ging part­ner­ships with former rivals.

  • Online Or Bust: Why 2009 May Be The Nail In News­pa­pers’ Coffins | paid­Con­tent — [T]here’s a strong case for say­ing 2009 will mark a shift from sea­sonal, sens­ible belt-tightening to the long-term shrink­ing of the news­pa­per industry in Britain

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: