Unrequired Reading {5.1.09}

January 6, 2009

Unrequired Reading

These are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • Frus­trated report­ers locked out of Gaza war zone | The Asso­ci­ated Press — Israel scrapped arrange­ments Monday to allow the first for­eign report­ers into the Gaza Strip since the mil­it­ary launched its offens­ive against Palestinian mil­it­ants, adding to mount­ing media frus­tra­tion at being locked out of the war zone.
    The ban on for­eign media, which has been appealed to the Israeli Supreme Court, drew cri­ti­cism from journ­al­ists that Israel is try­ing to man­age the story.
    Israel asserts that open­ing bor­der cross­ings for journ­al­ists would endanger staff at the ter­min­als, which have often been tar­geted by militants.
  • Israel’s Gaza strategy | Mar­tin Kramer’s Sand­box — The Israeli oper­a­tion is meant to impress on Hamas that there is some­thing far worse than the sanctions—that Israel is cap­able of hunt­ing Hamas on air, sea, and land, at tre­mend­ous cost to Hamas and min­imal cost to Israel, while much of the world stands by, and parts of it (includ­ing some Arabs) quietly applaud. Israel’s aim is not to bring down Hamas at this stage, but to com­pel it to accept a cease-fire on Israel’s terms—terms that leave the sanc­tions in place.

    Many West­ern and Arab gov­ern­ments see the logic of this. They would like to see Abbas and the Palestinian Author­ity back in author­ity over Gaza, thus restor­ing cred­ib­il­ity to the “peace pro­cess.” Because they wish to see Hamas con­tained if not dimin­ished, they have moved slowly or not at all to respond to calls for action to stop the fight­ing. The ques­tion now is how Israel turns its mil­it­ary moves into polit­ical moves that achieve the shared object­ives of this coali­tion of convenience.

  • Bowen diary: Deluge of envoys | BBC News — This diary is not going to be about the media, but in the interests of full dis­clos­ure I will try to expose some of the work­ings of the news machine here.
    The days are long for a reporter cov­er­ing the war. Since I came over here from Lon­don the day after Israel star­ted its offens­ive, I have spent part of every day in Jer­u­s­alem, and then gone down to the bor­der with Gaza, which is about an hour and a half away by car.
    The ter­rain is flat, but there are a few small hills which have been col­on­ised by TV teams and their satel­lite trucks.
    Journ­al­ists stand there, try­ing to get a long range view of what is going on, and pic­tures of Israeli attacks. It has got harder in the last few days, as the Israelis have pen­et­rated deeper into the Gaza Strip.
    They are fur­ther away, and harder to see.
  • Zion­ists are the new Nazis | Gulfnews — The case for journ­al­ism edu­ca­tion in the Middle East: “Today, the whole world stands as a wit­ness to the fact that the Nazi holo­caust was a mere lie, which was devised by the Zion­ists to black­mail human­ity. The same Zion­ist entity swindled the world out of bil­lions of dol­lars over the years to com­pensate the wrong and unjust which they claim to have been inflic­ted on their people.”
  • Now for My Next Trick, I’ll Turn Brand into Cash | SarahLacy.com — I’m more suc­cess­ful work­ing for myself than I was on staff for just one pub­lic­a­tion: income, name recog­ni­tion, oppor­tun­it­ies, amaz­ing once-in-a-lifetime exper­i­ences. And, while I’m not immune, I’m safer head­ing into this down­turn than in the past because all my income doesn’t hinge on one gig. In terms of journ­al­ism, it’s way more suc­cess­ful. I have the chal­lenge only to find great stor­ies and tell them. And gen­er­ally any story I love, I’ve got a plat­form for it. Some­times it’s a visual story; some­times it’s a big idea story that’s fin­an­cially com­plex but per­fect for a column. Fre­quently, stor­ies aren’t right for TechTicker or Busi­nes­s­Week, but might work for  this blog or a freel­ance pro­ject or maybe even (hint?) a new book. I can’t tell you how free­ing that is after years of labor­i­ously pitch­ing stor­ies, writ­ing stor­ies I didn’t care about & hav­ing to play the news­room game. But when it comes to stats, the syn­ergy and the cross pro­mo­tion hasn’t been as easy as it would seem on paper.
  • New powers for police to hack your PC | The Inde­pend­ent — Police have been given the power to hack into per­sonal com­puters without a court war­rant. The Home Office is facing anger and the threat of a legal chal­lenge after grant­ing per­mis­sion. Min­is­ters are also draw­ing up plans to allow police across the EU to col­lect inform­a­tion from com­puters in Britain.

    The moves will fuel claims that the Gov­ern­ment is presid­ing over a steady exten­sion of the “sur­veil­lance soci­ety” threat­en­ing per­sonal privacy.

  • Dir­ect­gov starts 2009 with three new senior dir­ect­ors | PublicTechnology.net :: e-Government & pub­lic sec­tor IT news + job vacan­cies: — Guy Ker is the new Dir­ector of Pub­lish­ing. He is a former Man­aging Editor of Chan­nel Four News and his last post was Chief Oper­at­ing Officer at ITN.

    Guy will be respons­ible for pub­lish­ing gov­ern­ment inform­a­tion and ser­vices for cit­izens across all Dir­ect­gov digital chan­nels — web, mobile and TV — and ensur­ing the smooth run­ning of pub­lish­ing across Dir­ect­gov. He will be cham­pi­on­ing Dir­ect­gov to all gov­ern­ment stake­hold­ers and main­tain­ing the pro­pos­i­tion for cit­izens — as a clear, easy to use and trus­ted channel.

  • The gentle sci­ence of per­sua­sion, Part 6: Scarcity | Knowledge@W.P. Carey — [H]umans are more motiv­ated to act by the idea of poten­tial loss than of poten­tial gain. Numer­ous stud­ies have proven just that.

    Research­ers in 1988 con­duc­ted a study (that even­tu­ally appeared in the Journal of Applied Psy­cho­logy) in which they sent slightly con­trast­ing mes­sages to homeown­ers in the same neigh­bor­hood to test the power of loss lan­guage: Half of the homeown­ers were told how much money they could save by fully insu­lat­ing their homes; they other half were told how much they could lose if they didn’t insu­late their homes.

    Basic­ally what the research­ers said was, ‘If you insu­late your home fully, you’ll save 50c every day.’ That was for half of the homeown­ers.” Cialdini says. “With the other half, homeown­ers were told, ‘If you fail to insu­late your home fully, you’ll lose 50 cents every day. In the end, 150% more people insu­lated under loss lan­guage than gain lan­guage. It was the same 50c, but people are more mobil­ized into action by the idea of los­ing something.”

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: