<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War 2.0: Israel, Twitter and YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adrianmonck.com/2009/01/war-20-israel-twitter-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2009/01/war-20-israel-twitter-youtube/</link>
	<description>a blog about news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2009/01/war-20-israel-twitter-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=2732#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>I agree about Rachel Shabi&#039;s piece, Michael. But your link is dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about Rachel Shabi’s piece, Michael. But your link is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Haddon</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2009/01/war-20-israel-twitter-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-2140</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Haddon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=2732#comment-2140</guid>
		<description>I agree that the use of social media on this occasion seemed bizarre as it offered nothing of real value to users of Twitter.  In the Guardian Rachel Shabi &lt;a&gt;argued&lt;/a&gt;  Israel propoganda &quot;tightly coordinated key messages and worked on so many levels – mainstream media as well as diplomatic channels, friendship leagues, YouTube, Twitter and the blogosphere – that the effect was epidemic.&quot; But this to me seems nothing more than the result of journalistic fascination with &#039;new media&#039; being used in unusual ways.  I think she underplays the part played by Israel&#039;s banning of foreign journalists, surely that contributed significantly to unbalanced reporting? 

And, as you teach us at City, I thought I would add a &lt;a&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to the account itself.  You know, those pesky sources!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the use of social media on this occasion seemed bizarre as it offered nothing of real value to users of Twitter.  In the Guardian Rachel Shabi <a>argued</a>  Israel propoganda “tightly coordinated key messages and worked on so many levels – mainstream media as well as diplomatic channels, friendship leagues, YouTube, Twitter and the blogosphere – that the effect was epidemic.” But this to me seems nothing more than the result of journalistic fascination with ‘new media’ being used in unusual ways.  I think she underplays the part played by Israel’s banning of foreign journalists, surely that contributed significantly to unbalanced reporting? </p>
<p>And, as you teach us at City, I thought I would add a <a>link</a> to the account itself.  You know, those pesky sources!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
