Unrequired Reading {3.2.09 to 5.2.09}

These are some of the things that have caught my atten­tion lately. It’s a more eclectic mix than just the news busi­ness, but then so’s life:

  • Lebedev: down­turn has hal­ted expan­sion | The Guard­ian — Don’t you love a mogul who knows his Roman his­tory? “My per­sonal con­sump­tion is very lim­ited. I’m taught to be more Mar­cus Aure­lius than Cara­calla if you know your Roman his­tory,” he said.
  • How to Save Your News­pa­per | TIME — One of history’s iron­ies is that hyper­text — an embed­ded Web link that refers you to another page or site — had been inven­ted by Ted Nel­son in the early 1960s with the goal of enabling micro­pay­ments for con­tent. He wanted to make sure that the people who cre­ated good stuff got rewar­ded for it. In his vis­ion, all links on a page would facil­it­ate the accrual of small, auto­matic pay­ments for whatever con­tent was accessed. Instead, the Web got caught up in the ethos that inform­a­tion wants to be free. Oth­ers smarter than we were had avoided that trap. For example, when Bill Gates noticed in 1976 that hob­by­ists were freely shar­ing Altair BASIC, a code he and his col­leagues had writ­ten, he sent an open let­ter to mem­bers of the Homebrew Com­puter Club telling them to stop. “One thing you do is pre­vent good soft­ware from being writ­ten,” he railed. “Who can afford to do pro­fes­sional work for nothing?”
  • Obama, as News Media Critic, Con­curs with Tyn­dall Report | Andrew Tyn­dall — A non­sensical ques­tion by ABC’s Gibson–although not as glar­ingly flawed as Couric’s–betrayed his lack of atten­tion to the very Eco­nom­ics 101 tutori­als that his busi­ness cor­res­pond­ent Betsy Stark taught us here and here last week. “There is a lot of people who have said it is a spend­ing bill and not a stim­u­lus,” Gib­son inquired. Yet, by defin­i­tion, a demand-side fiscal stim­u­lus of a reces­sion­ary eco­nomy con­sists of deficit-financed gov­ern­ment spend­ing. Charlie! Pay atten­tion to Betsy!
  • PR treats journ­al­ists not as resources, but like car com­pan­ies treat sup­pli­ers | Charles Arthur — [I]f you won­der, as a journ­al­ist, why it is that you get people who seem to have no idea what you do or why you even exist, but do seem to think it’s ter­ribly import­ant that you received some email or other, think of it like this: you’re the com­pany that makes wing mir­rors, and the car man­u­fac­turer wants to make sure you received its order that it sent the other day.

    The fact that the order was for 5,000 rear-view mir­rors — well, that’s just how the world is sometimes.

  • The Prob­lem with The Boy in the Striped Paja­mas | Opinio Juris — The Boy in the Striped Paja­mas … par­takes of the same logic of iden­ti­fic­a­tion that cor­rupts movies like Schindler’s List: we cer­tainly don’t want the Jew­ish boy to die, but we really don’t want the Ger­man boy to die, because he has done noth­ing to deserve his fate – the sins of the father should not be vis­ited upon his son.

    The prob­lem with that, of course, is that no one deserved to die in the gas cham­ber – not the Ger­man boy, not the Jew­ish boy, and cer­tainly not the other Jew­ish pris­on­ers.  The movie thus does both the viewer and the Holo­caust a great dis­ser­vice by for­cing us, via its nar­rat­ive struc­ture, to identify with the Ger­man boy.  Inno­cence does not admit degrees.

  • Can Google save news by shar­ing the wealth? | Kirk Lapointe — [T]he pre­ced­ent of Google’s recent set­tle­ment on the pub­lish­ing fron­tier sug­gests there is some cur­rency in Osnos’ argu­ment, so the time ahead will be inter­est­ing if the news busi­ness decides to jostle more ser­i­ously and not just mut­ter its disapproval.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>