<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The redundant story: math and the future of journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adrianmonck.com/2009/06/redundant-story-math-future-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2009/06/redundant-story-math-future-journalism/</link>
	<description>a blog about news and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Watts</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2009/06/redundant-story-math-future-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=3178#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>Not sure if I entirely agree, but nevertheless an interesting idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if I entirely agree, but nevertheless an interesting idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riverScrap</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2009/06/redundant-story-math-future-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>riverScrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=3178#comment-2866</guid>
		<description>Great piece. Journalism in its current state would certainly benefit from a re-alignment with mathematical certainties; but I don&#039;t think this is desirable at the expense of language&#039;s primary asset - its ambiguity.

A mathematical equation can never tell a story, precisely because a story hinges on the reader&#039;s intimacy &amp; ability to subjectively empathise with its subject matter. Yes, this can be manipulated, but it can also be deployed to brilliant and ethically justifiable effect.

The media shouldn&#039;t let the excesses of a few bone-headed journalists dampen its scope for creativity. Definitive facts ain&#039;t that interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece. Journalism in its current state would certainly benefit from a re-alignment with mathematical certainties; but I don’t think this is desirable at the expense of language’s primary asset — its ambiguity.</p>
<p>A mathematical equation can never tell a story, precisely because a story hinges on the reader’s intimacy &amp; ability to subjectively empathise with its subject matter. Yes, this can be manipulated, but it can also be deployed to brilliant and ethically justifiable effect.</p>
<p>The media shouldn’t let the excesses of a few bone-headed journalists dampen its scope for creativity. Definitive facts ain’t that interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hanley</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2009/06/redundant-story-math-future-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=3178#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>O please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

