<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for adrian monck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adrianmonck.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adrianmonck.com</link>
	<description>a blog about news and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nassim Taleb’s Black Swan — a Turkey by Rogue Medic</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/03/nassim-taleb%e2%80%99s-black-swan-a-turkey/comment-page-1/#comment-3888</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Medic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=845#comment-3888</guid>
		<description>Quant,

You make a bunch of claims, but do not provide any evidence. Are you trying to provide a contrast?

You claim that Taleb is anti-probability, but Taleb is actually the one who is pointing out the ways in which we ignore probability.

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quant,</p>
<p>You make a bunch of claims, but do not provide any evidence. Are you trying to provide a contrast?</p>
<p>You claim that Taleb is anti-probability, but Taleb is actually the one who is pointing out the ways in which we ignore probability.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nassim Taleb’s Black Swan — a Turkey by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/03/nassim-taleb%e2%80%99s-black-swan-a-turkey/comment-page-1/#comment-3887</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=845#comment-3887</guid>
		<description>I think that Taleb&#039;s critics miss what can be stated simply, as in K.I.S.S.

Shiite happens even on a Sunni day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Taleb’s critics miss what can be stated simply, as in K.I.S.S.</p>
<p>Shiite happens even on a Sunni day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nassim Taleb’s Black Swan — a Turkey by Quant</title>
		<link>http://adrianmonck.com/2008/03/nassim-taleb%e2%80%99s-black-swan-a-turkey/comment-page-1/#comment-3886</link>
		<dc:creator>Quant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adrianmonck.com/?p=845#comment-3886</guid>
		<description>Taleb&#039;s attempts to formalize his thoughts are scattered far and wide but represent an astonishingly low citation to download ratio. In Taleb&#039;s case, few have been able to build upon what he has to say and nobody has been able to to so in a technical sense. The reason is simple: Taleb doesn&#039;t make sense. 

True, many have quoted Taleb, referred to him in general terms, or intimated that there is some underpinning theory - and this vague  anti-probability bandwagon is one of the more surprising post-crisis phenomena. But the element of surprise isn’t always enough. By necessity this populist crusade is a comedic battle pitched between important sounding prose and the terse but plainspoken language of mathematics: a verbal assault on one of the great abstract constructions, its relevance to the real world, and its role in financial calamity. Or if you prefer sporting analogies, recall the image of gymnast Brian Meeker overstepping the springboard and ploughing headlong into the pommel horse. 

http://quantapology.blogspot.com/2011/10/fuck-off-you-pelican-congress-shouldnt.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taleb’s attempts to formalize his thoughts are scattered far and wide but represent an astonishingly low citation to download ratio. In Taleb’s case, few have been able to build upon what he has to say and nobody has been able to to so in a technical sense. The reason is simple: Taleb doesn’t make sense. </p>
<p>True, many have quoted Taleb, referred to him in general terms, or intimated that there is some underpinning theory — and this vague  anti-probability bandwagon is one of the more surprising post-crisis phenomena. But the element of surprise isn’t always enough. By necessity this populist crusade is a comedic battle pitched between important sounding prose and the terse but plainspoken language of mathematics: a verbal assault on one of the great abstract constructions, its relevance to the real world, and its role in financial calamity. Or if you prefer sporting analogies, recall the image of gymnast Brian Meeker overstepping the springboard and ploughing headlong into the pommel horse. </p>
<p><a href="http://quantapology.blogspot.com/2011/10/fuck-off-you-pelican-congress-shouldnt.html" rel="nofollow">http://quantapology.blogspot.com/2011/10/fuck-off-you-pelican-congress-shouldnt.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

