Al Jazeera, the Marash analysis

So Dave Marash admits he quit Al Jaz­eera Eng­lish after being bumped out of the anchor chair and on to the road. Not exactly how he first explained it. Still, we all have our amour propre, what is inter­est­ing in the CJR piece is his ana­lysis of the shift­ing polit­ics of Qatar (my links in the copy below):

I think that the world changed about nine, ten months ago. And I think the single event in that change was the visit to the gulf by Vice Pres­id­ent Cheney, where he went to line up the allied ducks in a row behind the pos­sib­il­ity of action against Iran.

And instead of get­ting acqui­es­cence, the United States got defi­ance, and instead ducks in a row the ducks basic­ally went off on their own and the first sort of major break­through on that was the Mecca agree­ment, which defied the Amer­ican for­eign policy by let­ting Hamas into the tent of the gov­ernance of the Palestinian territories.

This enraged the State Depart­ment and was one crys­tal clear sign that the Mideast region was now off cam­pus, was off on its own.

And it is around this time, and I think not coin­cid­ent­ally, that you see the state of Qatar and the royal fam­ily of Qatar start­ing to make up their feud with the Saudis, and you start to see on both Al Jaz­eera Arabic and Eng­lish a very sort of first-personish, “my Haj” stor­ies that were boos­t­er­ish of the Haj and of Saudi Arabia.

And you start to see stor­ies of ana­lysis in the New York Times where regional people are not­ing that Al Jaz­eera seems to be chan­ging its edit­or­ial stance toward Saudi Arabia.

I’m sug­gest­ing that around that time, a decision was made at the highest levels of [Al Jaz­eera] that simply fol­low­ing the Amer­ican polit­ical lead­er­ship and the Amer­ican polit­ical ideal of global, uni­ver­sal­ist val­ues car­ried out in an abso­lutely pure, mul­ti­polar, First Amend­ment global con­ver­sa­tion, was no longer the safest or smartest course, and that it was time, in fact, to get right with the region.

And I think part of get­ting right with the region was slightly chan­ging the edit­or­ial ambi­tion of Al Jaz­eera Eng­lish, and I think it has sub­sequently become a more nar­rowly focused, more uni­vocal chan­nel than was ori­gin­ally conceived.

Al Jazeera English: management shake-up

I try not to pass on every rumour I hear, but on at least two sep­ar­ate occa­sions recently strong hints have been dropped to me that sug­gest a man­age­ment shake up is com­ing soon at Al Jaz­eera Eng­lish. This is code for someone repla­cing CEO Nigel Par­sons.

Par­sons has sur­vived much longer than I would have pre­dicted — given the delays launch­ing the chan­nel — but now that it has been run­ning for a while it needs to move on, and Par­sons might well feel the same.

If there’s a prob­lem with AJE for me, it’s that it doesn’t have an edit­or­ial voice, and it doesn’t get talked about (except when David Frost for­got to ask Benazir Bhutto if OBL really was dead). Ulti­mately, that edit­or­ial voice needs to eman­ate from the Middle East, rather than from the min­eral depths of a glass of Chablis.

Someone Middle East­ern, with a ser­i­ous edit­or­ial back­ground and who under­stands Wash­ing­ton might be a good choice. Who might that be?

Wikipedia: the gift that keeps on giving…

It seems that even tele­vi­sion is not safe from Wiki­pe­dia spot­ters. A Syr­ian blog points to some smooth script re-purposing over at Al Jaz­eera Eng­lish on their series A Ques­tion of Arab Unity.

ALJAZ
“Nas­ser and his fel­low officers assured Bri­tain that it would respect Brit­ish cit­izens and prop­erty in Egypt, lim­it­ing the pos­sib­il­ity of inter­ven­tion against the coup. The revolu­tion­ar­ies also bowed to Amer­ican pres­sure by allow­ing the deposed King Farouk and his fam­ily to leave Egypt.”

WIKIPEDIA
“[T]he newly installed gov­ern­ment imme­di­ately assured Bri­tain that it would respect Brit­ish cit­izens and prop­erty in Egypt, greatly dimin­ish­ing the pos­sib­il­ity of inter­ven­tion against the coup. Nas­ser and his fel­low revolu­tion­ar­ies also bowed to Amer­ican pres­sure by allow­ing the deposed King Farouk and his fam­ily to leave Egypt.”

Spot the dif­fer­ence? Some nice copy-and-pasting going on in Doha.

There is more, too.

What’s gone wrong at Al Jazeera English?

Check out the anonym­ous piece below on Al Jaz­eera Eng­lish, pos­ted — bizar­rely — in the com­ments sec­tion of a Dubai media blog on 26 Decem­ber, 2007. It cer­tainly chimes with some of the things I’ve heard. And fur­ther below, more on soft-pedalling re. Saudi Ara­bia at AJE’s Arabic sis­ter chan­nel:

What’s gone wrong at Al Jaz­eera English?

Al Jaz­eera Eng­lish, a one bil­lion dol­lar pro­ject fin­anced by the Emir of Qatar and based in the small Ara­bian Pen­in­su­lar, prom­ised a fresh per­spect­ive on world news. The crit­ics may have hailed the chan­nel and com­pli­men­ted its unbiased report­ing, but behind the scenes things have not been nearly so suc­cess­ful with mor­ale at the sta­tion on the decline for the past year.

Al Jaz­eera Eng­lish (AJE) prom­ised to give voices to the voice­less. Unfor­tu­nately for staff at the Doha base of AJE, the voice­less have turned out to be the very staff try­ing to pro­duce the news.

In an extraordin­ary meet­ing held last Thursday, a tired look­ing Nigel Par­sons, Man­aging Dir­ector of AJE, took ques­tions from an angry group of over 100 from all levels of the com­pany. Up to then, staff have had to keep their com­plaints to them­selves. Unfor­tu­nately for Nigel Par­sons he walked straight into a vol­ley of extraordin­ar­ily upset staff who were not hold­ing back with their venom.

What has happened at AJE? What led to Nigel walk­ing into the verbal equi­val­ent of a lynching?

Delayed for over 18 months, it began trans­mit­ting on 1 Novem­ber, 2006, but much like some of the new build­ings in Doha, almost imme­di­ately cracks began to emerge. If one was to pin­point the exact moment a nail was hammered into the heart of AJE, it was per­haps in the 48 hours before launch, when a fate­ful decision was made, to change the name from Al Jaz­eera Inter­na­tional to Al Jaz­eera Eng­lish — a small change on the face of it, but behind the scenes the change was more than just a name.

It was at this moment that AJE would no longer be a stand alone chan­nel with all of its own in-house ser­vices but would become part of the Al Jaz­eera Net­work, this Net­work includes sports, doc­u­ment­ary and children’s channels.

Overnight senior depart­mental man­agers and their staff became obsol­ete. Man­agers of fin­ance, pro­gram­ming, per­son­nel, tech­no­logy, engin­eer­ing and oth­ers sud­denly found them­selves answer­ing to exist­ing man­agers with their own staff. None sur­vived 12 months.

Imme­di­ately the qual­ity of ser­vice dropped. This came as no sur­prise to staff in Doha, and what was clear to staff seemed unex­pec­ted to the new man­agers. With no new staff, exist­ing teams of people used to deal­ing only with Arabic Al Jaz­eera, now had over 400 new staff — mainly from West­ern Europe — to deal with. The depart­ments most under stress were also the most import­ant ones — per­son­nel and finance.

This added work­load res­ul­ted in long delays to fam­ily visas, med­ical check-ups (man­dat­ory for expats in Qatar) and con­tract issu­ance. Now many people accep­ted the ini­tial delays as part of doing busi­ness in the Gulf, a place where gla­cial is the term used to describe any busi­ness activ­ity. Only the ser­vice didn’t get any bet­ter, and things deteri­or­ated further.

The lack of a ded­ic­ated per­son­nel depart­ment has meant chronic delays in hir­ing addi­tional staff. This, coupled with an unof­fi­cial ban on any staff being hired from Europe/Australia/NZ, meant man­agers were forced to scrabble through CVs to find people fit­ting the new profile.

Also man­agers were forced to obtain a clear­ance from the board of dir­ect­ors for all new mem­bers of staff, and if the board rejec­ted your choice for a pos­i­tion you were forced to go back to square one.

In addi­tion to this, and almost unbe­liev­ably, no one at AJE has been given a con­tract since June 2006, and the staff that were issued con­tracts were told shortly after they arrived that the prom­ised bene­fits were not guaranteed.

It was shortly after June that the cuts began — two flights home became one, full med­ical bene­fits sud­denly became sub­sid­ized only, and most con­tro­ver­sially, rumours star­ted fly­ing that school fees would no longer be paid. A dev­ast­at­ing blow to the many people who had brought their chil­dren to the Qatari desert. Many with large fam­il­ies now faced crip­pling costs of sky high school fees, forced up by an influx of expats that have flocked to the coun­try in the last couple of years.

Fam­il­ies that only 18 months ago were pre­par­ing a for new life in the desert King­dom now have to face the fact that they will have to return to their respect­ive coun­tries much sooner than planned.

Along with the imme­di­ate loss of bene­fits and the fin­an­cial implic­a­tions this has on staff a more fun­da­mental prob­lem exists at AJE.

Since the integ­ra­tion into the Net­work, AJE has found itself slowly being drawn into the archaic ways that the Arabic chan­nel had always run on. Thus, in 2007, the chan­nel was now being forced into work­ing prac­tices not seen in tele­vi­sion since the 1980s.

One of the fun­da­mental prob­lems was the idea of multi-skilling. In a mod­ern news­room it’s unheard of for an indi­vidual to hold a single role, journ­al­ists now edit pack­ages, a dir­ector can vis­ion mix, a cam­era oper­ator does sound, a sound-man does autocue, etc. News is now based around the idea. The res­ult of this and the mod­ern tech­no­logy involved in the new chan­nel, is a staff level half that of its sis­ter chan­nel, but the wage bill is not half.

A point of dis­agree­ment at the Arab chan­nel. For an out­sider it seems obvi­ous that it’s bet­ter to pay a single Director/Vision Mixer £40k p.a. rather than pay a Dir­ector £40k and the Vis­ion Mixer £40k — to any­one the sav­ing was clear, how­ever, to the bosses at the Arabic sta­tion these were unheard of sums to be paid to an individual.

To this end all salar­ies offered to staff since June 2006 have been sig­ni­fic­antly lower than ones offered before that date. This has com­poun­ded the employ­ment prob­lems of man­agers who face hav­ing to hire staff on some­times half the ori­ginal wage of their colleagues.

The prob­lem is that £40k for a Vis­ion Mixer/Director was already on the low side of industry scales and the same held true across AJE. Remem­ber these roles are based in Doha, Qatar, not cent­ral London.

Con­trary to industry assump­tions the com­pany were not hand­ing out gold bars at the arrivals lounge, the wages have only ever been con­sidered aver­age, what made the wage accept­able to many was the over­all pack­age of bene­fits includ­ing hous­ing, and the fact that due to Qatar’s huge oil wealth there is no income tax.

Now, of course, no tax may have attrac­ted a few, but talk to staff and the over­rid­ing feel­ing is that staff signed up to be part a his­toric chan­nel launch. It is this that has kept the chan­nel going des­pite the now chronic staff short­ages and the gradual erod­ing of benefits.

Now though it seems that the staff have had enough. Its not quite clear what the straw that broke the camels back actu­ally was, school­ing per­haps or the fact that in a coun­try where infla­tion runs at 15%, the com­pany seems to have ruled out any pay rises. Or it may have been the over­whelm­ing feel­ing that des­pite many mem­bers of staff put­ting in over 70 hour weeks and not tak­ing leave for over a year, Al Jaz­eera doesn’t really seem to care.

It seems that the ded­ic­a­tion of the staff that’s pro­duced the award win­ning pro­gram­ming no longer have any respect from the Al Jaz­eera Man­age­ment, the feel­ing that “we are being used” was a pop­u­lar sen­ti­ment of the meet­ing. Pas­sions are run­ning so high that when one mem­ber of staff sug­ges­ted a 24-hour strike a ripple of “hear, hears” filled the room.

And it seems that the voices and con­cerns raised in the past year have been fall­ing on deaf ears. It tran­spired early in the meet­ing that Nigel Par­sons, the Man­aging Dir­ector, is not invited to Al Jaz­eera board­room meetings.

Instead he admit­ted to a stunned room that he gained his inform­a­tion through his sec­ret­ary who talks to another sec­ret­ary who sits in on the board­room meet­ings. It would appear that even at the highest levels there seems to be a lack of respect.

And it didn’t not go unnoticed that when a Man­aging Dir­ector gets his inform­a­tion from his sec­ret­ary there must be fun­da­mental prob­lems with the com­pany structure.

And the res­ult of the reduc­tion in bene­fits, and a seem­ingly uncar­ing atti­tude from the Net­work, over 13 resig­na­tions this week alone.

The MD is bra­cing for more as many people joined on two year con­tracts between Novem­ber 2005 and June 2006. Al Jaz­eera could be facing a ser­i­ous staff­ing crisis.

Clearly some­thing has to give, with your staff threat­en­ing walkout, and resign­ing at an alarm­ing rate it would appear that things will only get worse before they get better.

The ques­tion is though, with a Man­aging Dir­ector seem­ingly cut out of any decision mak­ing pro­cesses, how much worse will it get.

Will the chan­nel become a one bil­lion dol­lar white ele­phant before it cel­eb­rates its second birthday?

Whilst mean­while, at Al Jaz­eera Arabic, accus­a­tions in the New York Times that it has — as pre­dicted — softened its tone in report­ing on Saudi Ara­bia:

The newly cau­tious tone appears to have been dic­tated to Al Jazeera’s man­age­ment by the rulers of Qatar, where Al Jaz­eera has its headquar­ters. Although those rulers estab­lished the chan­nel a dec­ade ago in large part as a forum for crit­ics of the Saudi gov­ern­ment, they now seem to feel they can­not con­tinue to ali­en­ate Saudi Ara­bia — a fel­low Sunni nation — in light of the threat from Iran across the Per­sian Gulf.

The spectre of Iran’s nuc­lear ambi­tions may be par­tic­u­larly daunt­ing to tiny Qatar, which also is the site of a major Amer­ican mil­it­ary base.

The new policy is the latest chapter in a gradual domest­ic­a­tion of Al Jaz­eera, once reviled by Amer­ican offi­cials as little more than a ter­ror­ist pro­pa­ganda out­let. Al Jazeera’s broad­casts no longer routinely refer to Iraqi insur­gents as the “res­ist­ance,” or vic­tims of Amer­ican fire­power as “martyrs.”

The policy also illus­trates the way the Arab media, des­pite the new freedoms intro­duced by Al Jaz­eera itself a dec­ade ago, are still often treated as polit­ical tools by the region’s auto­cratic rulers.