Just who is the FT’s mysterious BBC Trust mole?

Anthony Fry, BBC TrustThe Fin­an­cial Times has a trenchant cri­tique of BBC World­wide and its impact on the pub­lic ser­vice broad­cast­ing debate.

But who exactly is the per­son ‘famil­iar with the BBC Trust’s think­ing’ that they quote? Or the lead­ing Lon­don banker? Don’t be temp­ted by the obvi­ous jig­saw iden­ti­fic­a­tion.

A per­son famil­iar with the BBC Trust’s think­ing says: “The suc­cess of World­wide has argu­ably threatened the BBC’s future more than any­thing else in recent times, by sim­ul­tan­eously provid­ing an image – pos­sibly illus­ory, pos­sibly not – of great wealth and a yard­stick, also pos­sibly illus­ory, of sup­posedly anti-competitive beha­viour.” Con­tinue read­ing

Media relations for the military: 101

How should the world’s armies respond to cri­ti­cism or neg­at­ive stor­ies in the media? Well they could take note of the health­ily robust approach demon­strated by Sri Lanka’s Min­istry of Defence. They tackle crit­ics head on! Check out a piece from their web­site below:

Mr. Iqbal Athas, stop insult­ing our sol­diers’ sacrifices

A free press or media can only flour­ish in a free soci­ety. In today’s world what threatens free soci­ety is ter­ror­ism, irre­spect­ive of its root cause. Whether it stems from com­mun­al­ism or reli­gious extrem­ism, ter­ror­ism is indeed a threat to a free soci­ety and there­fore to the free­dom of the media. Unfor­tu­nately, in our coun­try there are some self-appointed free media cham­pi­ons who do not seem to under­stand this. Per­chance, they do not want to, because pro­mot­ing ter­ror­ism may have become a luc­rat­ive busi­ness for them.

Mr. Iqbal Athas seems to be one such journ­al­ist who has been pan­der­ing to serve the needs of a ruth­less ter­ror­ist out­fit which is built on extreme com­mun­al­ism. Being a senior journ­al­ist and per­son who has earned lot of money and gained a repu­ta­tion by writ­ing defence columns to local and inter­na­tional print media, Mr. Athas’ recent work raises doubts whether he has been assist­ing in the psy­cho­lo­gical oper­a­tions of the LTTE terrorists.

In his most recent art­icle in the Sunday Times this week, which was head­lined “Heavy cas­u­al­ties as battles in north intensify”, Mr. Athas has clearly attemp­ted to hood­wink his read­ers on the actual defence situ­ation in the north by shrewdly manip­u­lat­ing facts.

It is our duty to inform our view­ers on the actual defence situ­ation in the north, while ask­ing them to ques­tion the pos­sible motives behind Mr. Athas’ abom­in­able attempt to desec­rate the sac­ri­fices of our soldiers.

Of course, this kind of no-nonsense approach out­rages lib­eral defend­ers of journ­al­ism like the Com­mit­tee to Pro­tect Journ­al­ists:

We wrote to you on Octo­ber 2, 2007, about writ­ten and verbal attacks that appeared on the Min­istry of Defence’s Web site about Iqbal Athas, con­sult­ant editor and defense cor­res­pond­ent for the Sunday Times of Sri Lanka. The accus­a­tions effect­ively equated Athas’ journ­al­ism with ter­ror­ism, after he repor­ted on set­backs the army faced in fight­ing with Tamil seces­sion­ists. The lengthy attack on Athas’ report­ing accused him of “insult­ing our sol­diers’ sac­ri­fices” and claims his report­ing “has been assist­ing in the psy­cho­lo­gical oper­a­tions of the LTTE ter­ror­ists.” The art­icle claims that “pro­mot­ing ter­ror­ism had become a luc­rat­ive busi­ness” for Athas. Athas was awar­ded CPJ’s Inter­na­tional Press Free­dom Award in 1994.

I mean, any­one would think the MoD were pick­ing on Athas! Not at all. They are scru­pu­lous in attack­ing a whole range of journ­al­ists. Here’s their latest:

It has been observed that cer­tain seg­ments of media in Sri Lanka have been striv­ing to tar­nish the good image of those gov­ern­ment offi­cials dir­ectly involved in the war against ter­ror­ism. Purely on com­mer­cial interests, these sec­tions of the media spin their own stor­ies to suit their agenda and mis­lead the public.

In a recent art­icle in the Daily Mir­ror, a writer blames army for not giv­ing a decent burial to sol­diers died in the bat­tle­front. In that fea­ture art­icle, the Daily Mir­ror wants its read­ers to believe that army burns bod­ies of sol­diers who sac­ri­fice their lives in battle, an not send them home for funer­als, to down play the cas­u­alty figures..

Defence.lk does not intend to provide any com­ment on this miser­able story since its view­ers may know the truth by simply inquir­ing from a sol­dier or some­body who has even the least know­ledge of mil­it­ary matters.

Such stor­ies may give some pleas­ure to a news­pa­per editor whose sole inten­tion get bet­ter perks; but for a sol­dier who risks his life in the front­lines it cer­tainly hurts to see how their sac­ri­fices are desec­rated by money hungry media industrialists.

The gen­eral pub­lic derives its per­cep­tion of the wider real­ity bey­ond dir­ect per­sonal exper­i­ence via the media. When the major media all sing a sim­ilar tune the pub­lic gen­er­ally assumes it is being hon­estly informed. This is why ter­ror­ists’ organ­iz­a­tions often invest their blood cash on media people. Such invest­ments always provide pro­pa­ganda bon­anza for the ter­ror­ist out­fits to fur­ther their cause.

Thus, what defence.lk wants to under­score is that this hate­ful media cam­paign against secur­ity forces will gain more vigour as the sol­diers get closer to their noble mis­sion; i.e.: to free the coun­try from terrorism.

It is true not every one of our view­ers may have the time or interest to become well-informed on the many issues and sort things out. Yet, they still may be aware that all these self assumed “Watch Dogs” always have a loud “Bark” but a little “Bite”. Today, these sec­tions of the media are noth­ing more than big busi­ness and far removed from their role of inform­ing the pub­lic. It appears that selling lies for money also comes under media freedom!!!

If you want more advice on how to toughen your military’s online response to defeat­ist media, just get in touch with your local Sri Lankan embassy. They’ll be sure to help!

Bring out the Branson

Branson bookScrew It, Let’s Do It. Looks like James Mur­doch has been tak­ing ‘les­sons in life’ from Richard Bran­son.

Sir Richard, a minor­ity share­holder in NTL, is unhappy because James has snuck in and bought a bil­lion quid’s worth of ITV stock. Sir Rick’s anger has led him into the dan­ger­ous aca­demic trap of assert­ing ‘strong’ media effects:

Government’s job is to regulate…Government’s job is to stop too much dom­in­ance in the media end­ing up in one person’s hand… Gov­ern­ments are scared stiff of Mur­doch … if the Sun, the Sunday Times, The Times, Sky, the News of the World — just to name a few of the things that Mur­doch owns — all come out in favour of a par­tic­u­lar polit­ical party, the elec­tion is likely to be won by that par­tic­u­lar polit­ical party.

And if you then tag on ITV to that as well, basic­ally we’ve got rid of demo­cracy in this coun­try and we might as well just let Mur­doch decide who’s going to be our Prime Minister. [BBC News]

Blimey! By Mur­doch, I pre­sume Sir Richard means James’s dad. But what about that elec­tion and demo­cracy stuff? Does News­Corp back win­ners, or make them? Are politi­cians really such vacil­lat­ing reeds that they do whatever Rupert Mur­doch tells them? Last time I checked Mur­doch père couldn’t even stop his own news chan­nel trash­ing one of his pub­lish­ing houses…[See the O.J. saga]

Are we really such vacil­lat­ing reeds that we vote the Sun/Times/NOTW line? Sky News and ITV News are reg­u­lated any­way — and to the best of my know­ledge, Sir Trev never used to slip in a quick “Vote Mag­gie” at the end of News At Ten.

Bran­son is a show­man. He can turn sour grapes into bal­samic vin­egar with Heston Blu­menthal–style fin­esse. But let’s not be taken in. If you want to see how Vir­gin have already been play­ing ITV’s regional news then check out this post. Ofcom did invest­ig­ate that…and they weren’t impressed.


Post­script: For fur­ther read­ing on the ITV saga, I recom­mend Steve Gold­stein’s enter­tain­ing piece: What do BSkyB, NTL know that the mar­ket doesn’t?