{"id":1193,"date":"2008-07-24T11:55:46","date_gmt":"2008-07-24T10:55:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/?p=1193"},"modified":"2008-07-24T12:11:08","modified_gmt":"2008-07-24T11:11:08","slug":"the-teller-not-the-tale-link-based-journalism-and-rewrites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/2008\/07\/the-teller-not-the-tale-link-based-journalism-and-rewrites\/","title":{"rendered":"The teller not the tale: link based journalism and rewrites"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a title=\"McDonalds by Dennis\" href=\"http:\/\/flickr.com\/photos\/41894190608@N01\/171067054\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/62\/171067054_3dac1aa2c5_m.jpg\" class=\"alignright frame\" alt=\"McDonalds by Dennis\" \/><\/a><span class=\"drop_cap\">W<\/span>hat value do newspapers add to information? A couple of days ago, I bookmarked <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/07\/22\/business\/media\/22adco.html?_r=1&amp;scp=2&amp;sq=McDonald's&amp;st=cse&amp;oref=slogin\" target=\"_blank\">this piece on product placement<\/a>, from the <em>New York Times<\/em>. Basically, it&#8217;s about coffee cups appearing on the desk during a local morning news show in Las Vegas.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lasvegassun.com\/news\/2008\/jul\/21\/eye-opener-pitch\/\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Las Vegas Sun<\/em><\/a> reported it first on Monday:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Oooooooh, they\u2019re calling out your name.<\/p>\n<p>Two cups of McDonald\u2019s iced coffee (BUY!) sit on the Fox 5 TV news desk, a punch-you-in-the-face product placement (BUY!) to chase down your morning news.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Quoted? Fox 5 news director, Adam Bradshaw, and Kelly McBride of the journalism ethics outifit, Poynter. The <em>New York Times<\/em> hat tips the <em>Las Vegas Sun<\/em>, ditches the breezy style &#8211; and the line that the coffee and ice cubes are fake &#8211; and clocks up eight quoted sources in under a thousand words.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>And then Tom Leonard of the <em>Telegraph<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/news\/worldnews\/northamerica\/usa\/2447192\/McDonalds-brings-product-placement-to-US-TV-news.html\" target=\"_blank\">told it yesterday<\/a>, with a little historical colour and just a quote from Bradshaw. He mentioned both the <em>NYT<\/em> and <em>LVS<\/em>. The <em>Guardian<\/em>&#8216;s Ed Pilkington popped in an additional quote from a hitherto unheard-from Poynter pundit.<\/p>\n<p>So what&#8217;s the benefit here? Are rewrites journalism? Is the news business busy eating itself?<\/p>\n<p>The original &#8216;fun&#8217; piece got the &#8216;shock and awe&#8217; treatment from the <em>NYT<\/em>, before being translated back into something for a different audience. Would <strong>Roy Greenslade<\/strong>&#8216;s presentation &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.guardian.co.uk\/greenslade\/2008\/07\/and_here_is_the_mcnews.html\" target=\"_blank\">in a blog<\/a> with the relevant links &#8211; have been the best way to tell the story online? <\/p>\n<p><strong>Jeff Jarvis<\/strong> argued in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.buzzmachine.com\/2007\/02\/22\/new-rule-cover-what-you-do-best-link-to-the-rest\/\" target=\"_blank\">Cover What You Do Best, Link To The Rest: <\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In the rearchitecture of news, what needs to happen is that people are driven to the best coverage, not the 87th version of the same coverage.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Well yes, journalism is on one level about information, but it&#8217;s all about audience. Most <em>Telegraph<\/em> and <em>Guardian<\/em> readers &#8211; in their capacity as information absorbers rather than seekers &#8211; probably don&#8217;t subscribe to the <em>NYT<\/em> media section, or care about the story sufficiently to enter into it with the depth and gravity of the <em>NYT<\/em>, or even want to click through to it, but they might want to be aware of it. And they might want that packaged in a casual but entertaining way.<\/p>\n<p>This is where the British journalistic tradition of caring more about the written word (see restaurant critic <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Giles_Coren\" target=\"_self\"><strong>Giles Coren<\/strong><\/a>&#8216;s impassioned defence of the indefinite article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/2008\/jul\/23\/mediamonkey\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>), than perhaps the facts (see the <em>FT<\/em>&#8216;s <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0\/a80bb276-51a2-11dd-a97c-000077b07658.html\" target=\"_blank\">Gideon Rachman<\/a><\/strong> on US vs UK journalism), conflicts with Jarvis&#8217; idea of a commoditised, fact-based media.<\/p>\n<p>My solution to that conflict? Arm-wrestling.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What value do newspapers add to information? A couple of days ago, I bookmarked this piece on product placement, from the New York Times. Basically, it&#8217;s about coffee cups appearing on the desk during a local morning news show in Las Vegas. The Las Vegas Sun reported it first on Monday: Oooooooh, they\u2019re calling out [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[1732,1725,1729,1724,1733,1619,1726,1731,1566,1705,1734,1730,1433,1475],"class_list":["post-1193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journalism","tag-adam-bradshaw","tag-ed-pilkington","tag-fact-based-media","tag-gideon-rachman","tag-giles-coren","tag-jeff-jarvis","tag-mcdonalds","tag-roy-greenslade","tag-the-guardian","tag-the-new-york-times","tag-the-telegraph","tag-tom-leonard","tag-united-kingdom","tag-united-states"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1193"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1193\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1196,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1193\/revisions\/1196"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}