{"id":3082,"date":"2009-04-28T21:00:12","date_gmt":"2009-04-28T21:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/?p=3082"},"modified":"2009-05-13T20:54:10","modified_gmt":"2009-05-13T19:54:10","slug":"opportunities-implications-bbc-partnerships-local-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/2009\/04\/opportunities-implications-bbc-partnerships-local-media\/","title":{"rendered":"The opportunities and implications of BBC partnerships with local media"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"drop_cap\">A<\/span> long time ago, I wrote the plan to run <strong>ITV News<\/strong> in London (replacing <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/London_News_Network\">LNN<\/a><\/strong>), modelled on the operating structure for <strong>Five News<\/strong>. It involved reformatting shows and cutting staffing to the bare minimum required to get on air. <\/p>\n<p>Nothing wrong with that. It was a more efficient use of resources. <\/p>\n<p>But it wasn&#8217;t really designed to involve the process you and I would know as <strong>journalism<\/strong>. It was intended to produce a happy simulation of a television news broadcast to a standard adequate enough to satisfy regulators.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Five News shared resources &#8211; as did the new ITV London when it started &#8211; with the rest of <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/itn.co.uk\/\">ITN<\/a><\/strong>. The biggest and most expensive of these resources were the satellite trucks and needless to say, the deployment of said trucks went to the people paying the most money &#8211; ITV&#8217;s national news and <strong>Channel 4 News<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>The editorial decision-making process played second-fiddle to the negotiation and horse-trading around satellite dishes, technicians&#8217; overtime and working hours without which stories and guests (even cheaper!) couldn&#8217;t make it on air. <\/p>\n<p>Now I love television news, but it&#8217;s an impressionistic not an informative medium. Its poetry is images not ad-libbed studio conversations. ITV&#8217;s regional news programmes &#8211; produced from studio hubs far removed from the politically and geographically diverse areas they serve, and manufactured to a process I had a hand in shaping &#8211; have, by force of that process, become hybrid forms of factual entertainment. <\/p>\n<p>And there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that either. But in its current emaciated form ITV regional news is not really worth saving as an instrument of &#8216;public service&#8217; news information. So why have the <strong>BBC<\/strong> and ITV signed a memorandum of understanding to share resources?<\/p>\n<p>Well, the BBC is desperate to use partnership as a line of defence against the predations of <strong>Channel 4<\/strong> and others who might question the casuistry that sees its populist and entertaining mainstream TV programmes labelled as &#8216;public service&#8217;. Partnership proposals beats enforced budget cuts. The BBC shows willing. Refusal to partner looks churlish.<\/p>\n<p>But in the case of ITV&#8217;s regional news, partnership simply sustains something that neither the market, nor the term &#8216;public service&#8217; really support.<\/p>\n<p>One BBC regional news head lamented to me recently that no one covered court cases in his area &#8211; not the local papers, not ITV, not the agencies &#8211; no one. He also pointed out that he could have used his multimedia newsroom to produce hyperlocal sites, and even newspaper copy &#8211; but he wasn&#8217;t allowed to, because the local newspaper lobby had weighed in to point out that he would drive them out of business.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s easy to feel sympathy for both sides. The commercial local news media and the BBC regional journalists who just want to do a better job.<\/p>\n<p>But they&#8217;re not really the issue. <\/p>\n<p>The issue is bigger and it affects all of us, not simply journalists. It&#8217;s about the collapse of plurality of media provision and how we adjust to that. Because plurality has collapsed. <\/p>\n<p>And the BBC can&#8217;t take its place, and the partnerships the BBC offers are simply life support machines for local news companies caught in a downward spiral of cost-cutting, audience decline, and share price collapse.<\/p>\n<p>Allowing the BBC in to hyperlocal would have killed those companies quicker. Partnership will ease their dying. Yet the question of how (or if ) we use public money to inform citizens about the governance and the good times in their localities in a way that isn&#8217;t simply puff and spin goes unasked. And the political and popular will to address it is almost entirely absent.<\/p>\n<p>So expect partnerships &#8211; or rather forced marriages &#8211; with all the happiness associated with relationships born of expediency&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>[Thanks to <strong>Paul Bradshaw<\/strong> for kicking me to write something. More at the <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinejournalismblog.com\/2009\/04\/29\/letter-to-govt-pt2-the-opportunities-and-implications-of-bbc-partnerships-with-local-media\/\">Online Journalism Blog<\/a>.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A long time ago, I wrote the plan to run <strong>ITV News<\/strong> in London (replacing <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/London_News_Network\">LNN<\/a><\/strong>), modelled on the operating structure for <strong>Five News<\/strong>. It involved reformatting shows and cutting staffing to the bare minimum required to get on air. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3082"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3082\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3113,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3082\/revisions\/3113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}