{"id":362,"date":"2007-03-21T05:13:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-21T11:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/?p=362"},"modified":"2007-03-21T05:13:00","modified_gmt":"2007-03-21T11:13:00","slug":"pr-vs-journalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/2007\/03\/pr-vs-journalism\/","title":{"rendered":"PR vs Journalism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"dropcaps\">J<\/span>ournalists rely increasingly on <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">PR<\/span> handouts. Take a paper as prestigious and high-minded as the <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">New York Times<\/span>. When researchers analysed a day&#8217;s output, they found 147 out of 255 stories came from flacks. An executive from ad agency <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">J.Walter Thompson<\/span> reckons 60% of the <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">NYT<\/span>&#8216;s stories come from PR. The problem is industry wide. One political scientist put the figure at 50% across all papers and says reporters are simply \u201cintellectual mendicants.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And the kicker is &#8211; the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NYT<\/span><\/span> study was done on <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">29 December 1926<\/span>. The advertising executive was talking about the paper in the early <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">1930s<\/span>, and the political scientist, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Peter Odegard<\/span>, was writing in <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">1930<\/span>. [HT: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Discovering-News-Michael-Schudson\/dp\/0465016669\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Michael Schudson<\/span><\/a>.]<\/p>\n<p>So it was ever thus &#8211; but is it getting worse? Dr <a style=\"font-weight: bold;\" href=\"http:\/\/mediastandardstrust.blogspot.com\/2007\/02\/pr-does-not-have-duty-to-tell-truth.html\" target=\"_blank\">Martin Moore<\/a> who&#8217;s a panellist at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cass.city.ac.uk\/media\/stories\/story_84_105659_71308.html\" target=\"_blank\">an event<\/a> I&#8217;m chairing tonight thinks so. Martin heads the <span style=\"font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;\">Media Standards Trust<\/span> and he <a href=\"http:\/\/mediastandardstrust.blogspot.com\/2007\/03\/news-via-youtube.html\" target=\"_blank\">blogs<\/a> on a recent <a href=\"http:\/\/image.guardian.co.uk\/sys-files\/Media\/documents\/2007\/03\/13\/Cardiff.Trinity.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">report<\/a> on UK newspaper group <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Trinity Mirror<\/span>: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The overwhelming finding is that fewer journalists are having to produce more stories in less time. To do this they are repackaging more agency copy and PR releases. 92% of the respondents to Franklin &#038; Williams&#8217; survey said they use more PR material than they used to. 80% said they use more agency copy. Journalism, in the words of the authors, \u201chas become an office job.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> Well they may be using more, but are they reaching anything like the levels of use recorded in the early 20th century?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.juliahobsbawm.com\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Julia Hobsbawm<\/span><\/a> is also on the panel. She&#8217;s argued that increased regulation of business makes PR professionals more accountable for the information they generate than journalists. Be interesting to see if PR exec <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Scott Learmouth<\/span> from <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediastrategy.co.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\">Media Strategy<\/a><\/span><\/span> agrees.<\/p>\n<p>Down the ages, journalists have managed to keep a Chinese Wall between their copy and advertisers wishes (although <a href=\"http:\/\/politics.guardian.co.uk\/columnist\/story\/0,,2035461,00.html\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Simon Jenkins<\/span><\/a> might not agree). Can PRs manage the client relationship as uncontroversially as lawyers?<\/p>\n<p>Does a world where PRs simply present the best message of a company or institution substitute for an independent mediated interpretation or representation of that message? Or journalism as we call it. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Carol Lewis<\/span>, Careers Editor at the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\">Times<\/a><\/span><\/span> will no doubt have something to say on that score.<\/p>\n<p>So journalism and PR &#8211; frenemies, fellow professionals, or healthy mutual suspicion? Work flow and industry regulation may have changed the dynamics of that relationship. But we have perhaps moved on from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.questia.com\/library\/book\/the-american-public-mind-by-peter-odegard.jsp\" target=\"_blank\">Odegard<\/a>&#8216;s line from 1930:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cMany reporters today are little more than intellectual mendicants who go from one publicity agent or press bureau to another seeking handouts.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0051036\/quotes\" target=\"_blank\">Match me Sidney<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Journalists rely increasingly on PR handouts. Take a paper as prestigious and high-minded as the New York Times. When researchers analysed a day&#8217;s output, they found 147 out of 255 stories came from flacks. An executive from ad agency J.Walter Thompson reckons 60% of the NYT&#8216;s stories come from PR. The problem is industry wide. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[238],"class_list":["post-362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journalism","tag-nyt"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}