{"id":999,"date":"2008-06-05T11:10:36","date_gmt":"2008-06-05T10:10:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/?p=999"},"modified":"2008-06-06T08:40:46","modified_gmt":"2008-06-06T07:40:46","slug":"westminster-media-forum-2-live-blogging","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/2008\/06\/westminster-media-forum-2-live-blogging\/","title":{"rendered":"Westminster Media Forum 2 &#8211; live blogging"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.westminsterforumprojects.co.uk\/mediaforum\/diary.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">WMF &#8211; Social networking, privacy and the press<\/a> <strong>David Evans, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ico.gov.uk\/ \" target=\"_blank\">Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ve had complaints about social media. Data is still &#8216;mine.&#8217;<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>IC is firstly about reminding people about possible dangers of revealing information online. Educating individuals, e.g. would you want mum, boss, teacher etc. to know this?<\/p>\n<p>75% of people using soc media sites haven&#8217;t read privacy rules. If you&#8217;re tagging people you&#8217;re also dealing with other people&#8217;s privacy.<\/p>\n<p>Do people need to think more carefully about privacy online? If so how?<\/p>\n<p>Digital privacy. Gap between how people act and what they think. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear argument is quite callous. Sharing is not perceived as publishing.<\/p>\n<p>Concerns about longevity of material. Good <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ojr.org\/ojr\/stories\/070822Zwerling\/\" target=\"_blank\">context<\/a> here btw [HT: Bill Thompson].<\/p>\n<p>[<em>Me &#8211; do we need Creative Commons Privacy?<\/em>]<\/p>\n<p>Fairness principle in use of soc media data. User expectations. Professional standards. We&#8217;re guided by PCC, unless journalist has misrepresented themselves to obtain data.<\/p>\n<p>Privacy environment changing constantly. Focus is on real risks. What about self-regulation, e.g. Beacon-gate for Facebook &#8211; users pressured Facebook into backing down.<\/p>\n<p>Platform provider responsibilities? What is the privacy impact? Can risks be managed by providers?<\/p>\n<p>Have to change the way we look at online. Enforcement is based on common sense. We have complaints about Wikipedia &#8211; we have other things to do&#8230;But what about complaints about users of a self-help group? Potential risks in location-based tracking of kids?<\/p>\n<p>Law applied sensibly can help, but we are not wading in applying principles written before soc media came on scene.<\/p>\n<p>Protection of personal info is a hot-button info for public who complain to IOC.<\/p>\n<p>Q&amp;A<\/p>\n<p>Q: Has there been a case involving soc media?<br \/>\nA: A few. One soc media site complained about for difficulties in removing details. Worked with Facebook on de-registering. Same thing with eBay. Tension with websites. Market value based on users. Others ongoing.<\/p>\n<p>Q: (John Whittingdale MP) Are you interpreting what you think Parliament meant re Data Protection? Or any case law?<br \/>\nA: Principles of legislation broad, thus contains future proofing. EU directive from which Data Protection legislation is derived is up for review. Research proposal out for tender.<br \/>\nJW: Puts you in a very powerful position?<br \/>\nA: 1st principle is fairness. Fair is very subjective. That&#8217;s where regulator comes in. We can&#8217;t do much though once we&#8217;ve decided something isn&#8217;t fair. Enforcement powers low. Private sector not bothered by slap on the wrist from us.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Soc media predicated on informed consent?<br \/>\nA: Consent is Hobson&#8217;s consent, e.g. no consent, no site use. How upfront are sites when they invite info submission? Focus on site and users, e.g. what are your default privacy settings? Informed consent used to be &#8216;Have you read this and signed it?&#8217; Danger of info being click-through and ticked.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>WMF &#8211; Social networking, privacy and the press David Evans, Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office We&#8217;ve had complaints about social media. Data is still &#8216;mine.&#8217;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-journalism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adrianmonck.com\/about\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}